this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
25 points (87.9% liked)

Programming

22006 readers
133 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Compile-time hierarchy of encapsulation that matches the domain model was a mistake.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Muratori

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago

So much time in my undergrad designing stupid inheritance hierarchies for systems (petrol stations, web servers, guidance systems), none of it even remotely applicable in my actual career as a dev. In fact, practically every time someone had done something “clever” with inheritance it caused subtle bugs or made maintenance and extension much harder than it should have been.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

This guy knows his stuff. Saw him on the standup podcast, and he vomits knowledge at you.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casey_Muratori

He is known for his work on Bink Video[2] and Granny 3D while working at RAD Game Tools, for popularizing the concept of immediate mode GUI (IMGUI) and coining the term [...]

Would an immediate mode GUI be a good match for Rust?

[–] Jayjader@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

according to https://areweguiyet.com/, there are currently 2 distinguished immediate-mode GUI libraries for rust:

I don't know whether that makes it a good match, but apparently it's at least feasible.