this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
13 points (74.1% liked)

science

20796 readers
233 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Negative = not blindly believing bullshit from one of the main parties?

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Thank you for supporting the article's point

[–] Pyroglyph@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I haven't read the article yet, but just going off the title, that makes sense?

If someone is an independent, they're clearly not happy with the way other parties are doing things. And not only are they not happy with them, they're so unhappy that they are deciding to actively run against them. The fact they'd be negative towards the status quo is a logical conclusion. It's like doing a study that finds that sand on a beach is, on average, wetter than sand in a desert.

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

toxic positivity/ negative peace aside, I would imagine that not being represented within the established political hegemony could foster some negative emotional response.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

beliefs are religious or political. fun to watch them trip over facts. i'm a negative creep