this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
81 points (98.8% liked)

politics

25117 readers
2211 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Newsom is a piece of shit that needs to go.

His views don't align with Dem voters nationally, and certainly not within Cali.

On this latest podcast, the meandering conversation started on America’s so-called “masculinity crisis”—a reference to real problems facing boys and men, such as higher rates of suicide and social isolation, or a nod to conservative pearl-clutching about the perceived “feminization” of American boys, depending on who you ask.

“Most of these kids, many of them [are] not even having any relations, sexual relations, with other women,” Newsom said.

The conversation went from lamenting how American youth don’t have enough sex, to hand-wringing about whether the LGBT rights movement may be pushing “sexuality” onto kids.

“Speaking of sexuality and divisiveness,” Ryan said, “One of the things in the last administration that really divided people was gender affirming care, LGBTQ [sic].” They incorrectly equated sexual orientation and gender identity, leading to a conversation about what Newsom called “the trans issue.”

“That's now no longer about celebrating your rights. It's about denying other people theirs,” Newsom said. “Marriage equality was about everyone's right [...] But your child may not have that same opportunity to get on the podium if a trans athlete is competing.”

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

He's just repeating the same right-wing talking points we have to debunk every single day, designed to portray trans people as some kind of looming general threat. Gavin Newsom is no kind of ally.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I keep wondering if he is planning on switching parties and running as a moderate republican in '28 and this is just laying the groundwork.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 24 points 3 weeks ago

If ONLY he would stop Fighting With Trump we could have HIM run for President!

-The DNC!

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Newsom is a textbook reactionary centrist.

Zimmer argued that this version of centrism is “not about policy positions” as such, but more about self-image. If you view yourself as a liberal but “are experiencing these reactionary impulses,” he said, “it creates a kind of intellectual and emotional dissonance that is often resolved by declaring that which makes you uncomfortable is radical and extreme.”

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

“That's now no longer about celebrating your rights. It's about denying other people theirs,” Newsom said. “Marriage equality was about everyone's right [...] But your child may not have that same opportunity to get on the podium if a trans athlete is competing.”

Let's look at this...

NCAA says out of 500,000 athletes, 10 (0.002%) are trans.

If an estimated 1% of the US population is trans, that's 34,000,000 people.

Assuming that all 10 of those athletes win medals, Newsom would sacrifice the actual human rights of 34 million to see 10 people get a symbolic token? This is sounding like an excuse to be shitty.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

3.4M, not 34M. And some trans athlete might not be open about it, understandably?

Not that it detracts from your point at all. As you said:

This is sounding like an excuse to be shitty.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oops, thanks for the correction! 😊

I'm sure there are more. I looked up high school athletes too but didn't include it because estimates ranged to like 3-4% which sounded reeeeally high.

And if we are counting people who suffer because they're punishing trans people for existing, it likely is 10x the amount. I hope that everyone, trans or not, has 10 people that would be upset if the law was threatening them. I know it's making me really upset and nervous for some of the people I know.

Anyone who says we need to push people toward depression or self harm so what's her face can get her 8th place swim medal has some real issues....

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Slippery slope. If we start giving trans athletes equal rights, soon we might be treating ALL of them like people. Where would that leave us?!

/s

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sure we could come up with something new to disagree on if we really tried. 😉

[–] Dubiousx99@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don’t forget his ex-wife is now shagging Don Jr.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Hey - cocaine's a helluva drug

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

God I hope he gets primaried

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

He won't. Just because he can't. Unless you're talking about a presidential run, in which case it sure seems like he's been doing everything he can to not get that nomination.