this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
97 points (98.0% liked)

Canada

10225 readers
480 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'd still rather have Canadian fighter jets deal with stuff in Canada. I know two planes doesn't make an invasion, but I don't want the USA getting too comfortable with flying in when they feel like it.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously. Can our own jets not handle a Cessna?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Can you not understand what NORAD is?

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't NORAD a joint defense organization between the US and Canada?

The article says jets from the US and Canada both responded and the US jets from NORAD were stood down once they new the plane had landed.

[–] AnarchoDakosaurus@toast.ooo 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. Im angsty about the Americans but joint interceptions have been happening since WW2 between us.

This is nothing out of the usual but Trumps posture certainly should have us rethinking this. We already know this line of thought of relying on America has met its rhetorical end of the road.

Some CBC readers have raised concerns that Canada wouldn't have been able to take action against it had the balloon been a threat.

Not an issue, according to Bercuson. He says one of the main points of NORAD is that Canadian and U.S. military aircraft need not seek permission every time they need to fly over each other's territory.

"So once the decision was made that this thing would be shot down," he said, "if we didn't have the capability of doing it, the Americans would do it."

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The sole occupant, huh? So he hijacked it from himself?

Edit: another source says he threatened a flight instructor, which I imagine was on the ground before he took off with the plane.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 8 points 2 weeks ago

I assume it could also mean hijacked from its planned course?

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you take control of it while it's on the ground it's just called a jacking

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well what the hell is a lojack then.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's a rabbit with antlers