this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
68 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

330 readers
455 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

  1. No paywalled sites at all.
  2. News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
  3. No videos.
  4. Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Evidently they also have a soft green glow.

[–] IAmLamp@fedia.io 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That’s the plutonium needed to get to 1.21 gigawatts

[–] CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is such a non-piece that it shouldn't have even been posted. Probably written by AI too.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't say it's not, but it does link to the actual paper, which cites a lot of other research and none of it seems to be hallucinations.

[–] CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The paper itself is proper - I'm still reading over it. But the 'article' linked to seems to be an AI summary with no actual substance to be found. It repeats itself a lot with rewordings of the same generic solid state batteries are better than "liquid batteries" because they're solid and not liquid.

I just doesn't pass the sniff test.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

since when are normal batteries not solid-state?

[–] yourNewFavouriteUser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Since they use liquid electrolytes, which leads to dendrites formation on the cathode and anode of the batteries, which can end up shorting the battery. The point of solid state batteries (if they ever can be made at scale) is to prevent that with (hopefully) better energy density and charge time than our current battery tech

[–] Ugurcan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How do they weigh versus a lithium ion?

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Supposedly more energy dense.

[–] UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Compared to a single lithium ion? Probably a lot more.

Seriously though google says solid state batteries weigh 1/3-2/3 of lithium ion batteries for the same capacity depending on the source.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That sounds promising. Good that they link to the research too. Not enough articles do that.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna hold my breath about this, because "breakthrough in smaller better battery tech" is a recurring headline seen for the better art of 20 years.

... But I am convinced that the next major leap forward when it comes to advancement of practical applications of tech that isn't stationary is going to involve a breachthrough in regards to battery capacity and size/weight. So as usual I'm curious where this leads.

Once we have something practical for the open market, we're going to see a lot more portable applications for tech, and I for one am looking forward to it.

“breakthrough in smaller better battery tech” is a recurring headline seen for the better art of 20 years.

And the batteries we have today are VASTLY better than what we had 20 years ago. Progress is always slow, but as far as batteries are concerned the progress that's been made has been incredible.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is this completely solid state or where some components are solid state?