this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

Ocean Conservation & Tidalpunk

639 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss news about our oceans & seas, marine conservation, sustainable aquatic tech, and anything related to Tidalpunk - the ocean-centric subgenre of Solarpunk.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What the scientists got right

  • Oil spills would decrease in frequency and quantity;
  • More food would be collected from rocky shores, both recreationally and commercially;
  • The global redistribution of non-native species would increase as global temperatures change;
  • A combination of agricultural intensification, and riverside and coastal urbanisation, would lead to increased sediment running into rivers, estuaries and seas.

What the scientists got partly right

  • The forecasts were insufficiently optimistic about reductions in the impacts of chemical compounds, such as tributyltin (TBT), which were subsequently the subject of international legislation;
  • Scientists were very aware of the influence of climate fluctuations, but didn't fully appreciate the varied impacts they would have on species and ecosystems;
  • They also underestimated the importance of extreme weather events resulting from climate change;
  • Scientists correctly predicted an increase in coastal defence structures to tackle rising sea levels and stormier seas but underestimated their likely impacts on wider coastal ecosystems;
  • Recreational use of coastal areas has increased, but rather than having a solely negative effect it has actually led to people appreciating these regions more.

What the scientists got wrong

  • Coastlines are more vulnerable now to eutrophication - an increase in the concentration of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus - than they were 25 years ago;
  • Concerns about the intensification of aquaculture, and particularly impacts from genetically modified organisms, have so far proved unfounded;
  • Anticipated harm to habitats as a result of offshore renewable energy installations has not materialized;
  • The impacts of ultraviolet radiation on coastal species were not fully appreciated.

What the scientists missed

  • The impacts of coastal mining;
  • Ocean acidification and its potential impact on marine species;
  • The effects of artificial light pollution;
  • The effects of noise pollution;
  • Extreme flood and drought events;
  • The scale and effects of plastic pollution;
  • The impacts of pharmaceutical contamination;
  • The combined effects of various environmental threats and chemical compounds.
no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here