this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
590 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
2445 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paulbg@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago

finally i'll be able to self-host one piece streaming

my qbittorrent is gonna love that

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I think if I needed to store 36TB of data, I would rather get several smaller disks.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] regedit@feddit.online 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it worth replacing within a year only to be sent a refurbished when it dies?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] needanke@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago (23 children)

What is the usecase for drives that large?

I 'only' have 12Tb drives and yet my zfs-pool already needs ~two weeks to scrub it all. With something like this it would literally not be done before the next scheduled scrub.

[–] Bael422@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's to play Ark: Survival Evolved.

[–] SuperUserDO@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is an enterprise storage shelf (aka a bunch of drives that hooks up to a server) made by Dell which is 1.2 PB (yes petabytes). So there is a use, but it's not for consumers.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's a use-case for a fuckton of total capacity, but not necessarily a fuckton of per-drive capacity. I think what the grandparent comment is really trying to say is that the capacity has so vastly outstripped mechanical-disk data transfer speed that it's hard to actually make use of it all.

For example, let's say you have these running in a RAID 5 array, and one of the drives fails and you have to swap it out. At 190MB/s max sustained transfer rate (figure for a 28TB Seagate Exos; I assume this new one is similar), you're talking about over two days just to copy over the parity information and get the array out of degraded mode! At some point these big drives stop being suitable for that use-case just because the vulnerability window is so large that the risk of a second drive failure causing data loss is too great.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Finally, a hard drive which can store more than a dozen modern AAA games

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›