Enshittification

395 readers

6 users here now

Welcome to Enshittification

A community for everyone who misspelt it as enshitification.

"I the onceler felt sad as I watched them all go, but business is business and business must grow, regardless of crummies in tummies you know."

This is your space to document the decay, demise, and destruction of the tech world as we know it. Share stories, articles, and firsthand experiences that capture the ongoing decline of once-celebrated platforms, services, and companies in the late stage capitalist landscape.

From monopolistic corporate shifts to anti-user updates and the relentless pursuit of profit over quality—if it’s broken, bloated, or just plain bad, it belongs here. We’re here to spotlight the moves that make the tech world worse, one piece of enshittification at a time.

Guidelines
🔹 Stay on Topic: Only post content about the decline of tech products, platforms, or companies.
🔹 Quality Content: Give some context when posting links or articles to drive quality discussions.
🔹 Respectful Discussion: Critique companies, crappy tech, and capital, not community members.
🔹 Positive Monday: The first Monday of every month is reserved for positive content only that shows enshittification isn't inevitable.

Join us to expose the changes that ruin the things we once loved and to discuss what comes next in a tech world gone wrong.

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net

When you use an enshitified platform, they see that. Govs are counting bootlickers’ metrics as a digitization success. (part 1/3) (infosec.pub)

submitted 2 weeks ago by activistPnk@slrpnk.net to c/enshitification@slrpnk.net

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The attachment is a page from the annual report by a national ombudsman produced for politicians who use the stats in policy making. The ombudsman accepts complaints online and also by analog means. The annual report considers the method of complaint submission a “key figure”.

This report shows 77% of submissions to be electronic. It indicates the digital platform is a “success”, to some extent. I’m not sure what their goal or expectation is, but there is certainly no shame or defeat in that figure. They are likely patting themselves on the back.

When a platform is enshitified, we need that metric to reflect failure. Suppose hypothetically their goal is 90% digital. They will investigate why 23% of complainants are submitting paper, calling, or appearing in person. Suppose such investigation were to find:

14% lack digital literacy
6% have no easy access to the Internet
3% other (e.g. refusal of enshitified platforms)

(^fabricated sample figures) They will ignore the 3% because it’s too small to help reach their goal. They will work on improving public access to the Internet (via libraries). They will recruit digitally competent people to help the elderly (and in fact they just started this.. called the “digital buddy program”).

In any case, if you dance for them and navigate their hurdles to submit an electronic form, whether you like it or not your submission sends a clear signal that the digital platform is a success. You therefore serve as an enabler.

Complaining despite being an enabler is generally insufficient. See part 2 of 3.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

there doesn't seem to be anything here