this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Alternatives to Popular Services

222 readers
2 users here now

A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain assistance for, and critique self-hosted alternatives to our favorite web apps, web...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/selfhosted by /u/vivianvixxxen on 2025-07-10 00:41:53+00:00.


I maintain about a half-dozen simple landing pages for businesses of friends and family and I'd like to save them a bunch of money by just moving things to something in the house. At most, across all the landing pages, we're looking at no more than a few hundred visits a day, tops (and that'd be an outlier event).

In my research into this topic, I feel like the common wisdom is "don't do it." But assuming I'm using basic security best practices, what are the drawbacks/dangers of hosting websites from home?

Currently, as a personal project, I'm hosting one website on the ol' world wide web. I have just port 443 open, ssh access locked with sha-256 rsa-2048, and using cloudlfare's dns proxy for the site.

So far, as near as I can tell, I've had no issues. This has led me to think that I could go ahead an self-host several more websites. Is this a bad idea? A fine idea? Should I use Cloudlfare Tunnels? Something else?

I'm in that late beginner stage where I know enough to know I don't know what the hell I'm doing. Any help is appreciated.

edit for extra context: I'm currently working off an old Raspberry Pi 3, though if I go forward with adding websites, I'd probably shell out for one of the new Raspberry Pi 5 16gb. That is, unless someone has a better suggestion.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here