Wow, it turns out if your core identity as a party includes attacking the validity of robust scientific claims, then scientists don't like your party quite as much. Who would have thought?
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10720 readers
40 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Shocking revelation: Scientists do not donate to the anti-science party.
The only way scientists could regain the “trust” of today‘s right is by telling them what they want to hear. But then they would stop being scientists because the right does not want to hear facts. They don‘t want truth, they want truthiness. Reality has a well-known liberal bias.