this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
29 points (76.4% liked)

Linux

10014 readers
489 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Original question by @POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

I started with Mandrake back in 2000 and used Red Hat at school. In 2004 Ubuntu was released and I adopted it for life. I switched from Ubuntu to Xubuntu to Ubuntu MATE to Kubuntu up to this day. It's the best because of all the quality of life additions, the stability of the LTS releases, the amount of widespread documenation, and general size of the community of users. This makes it a lot more easier to use and get help to troubleshoot any problems. So far it's been mostly a problem free and easy experience.

Until recently...

I just discovered Zorin OS and started messing around with it in a VM. I gotta say it's of of the best, most polished Gnome desktop experiences I've had so far with their free core version. While I love KDE for it's desktop experience being the closest to Windows there is, I usually find it has WAY too many customizations to a fault. Some people like this, but I find that the more you mess with configs, the more prone to problems it gets. I also find Gnome to be more well put together and well integrated. The fact the customization options are limited means I spend more time doing what I need to do than messing around with getting my desktop just right. I just hate the default Gnome destop and whatever paradigm they tried to make. That's why I've stuck with Kubuntu for a while. But with Zorin, I think they found the sweet spot. This might be my next install and I might recommend it to anyone who wants to get into Linux over Mint.

[–] crankyrebel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 months ago

I use Arch, btw, but I don't consider it the best (yes I do.) I could easily transition to Fedora, for example (I would never do that,) and be completely happy (I would rather continually hit my head with the metal stapler gun on my desk.)

[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 months ago

Does what I want and gets out of my way.

[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago

No further arguments needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UNY0N@linux.community 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Bazzite just works, it runs every game I have with zero fuss, it's easy to run Windows programs / emulators / local LLMs, AND it's basically unbreakable.

[–] statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't claim it's the best, but it's the best for me right now.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

On a gaming laptop I'm using Aurora because KDE Plasma btw (:

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Debian. It works so well that I never even looked at different distros during the last 20 years or so...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Mint is Ubuntu minus everything that makes Ubuntu annoying. That's why I like it.

I considered to go back to Debian but... eh, I'm too old and impatient for that. Nowadays I mostly want things that work out of the box.

[–] DesolateMood@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do things not work out of the box on debian?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

From what I remember*, there was always some rough corner. Such as the wi-fi, or the graphics card. Sure, Stable was rock solid, but you always needed something from Testing; and Testing in general was overall less stable than Ubuntu or Mint.

*This was years ago, so it might be inaccurate as of 2025.

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Linux Mint has a Debian Edition (LMDE) if you ever wanted a Debian that Just Works.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I did use the first LMDE for some time, and I loved it, it's a great distro. I don't recall why I went for the Ubuntu-based Mint later on, I think it was the PPAs?

The Ubuntu version does have all of Mint's tools and stuff. Pretty sure the Debian edition is missing the Driver Manager and maybe some others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It isn't, it is the least bad

[–] reseller_pledge609@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which technically makes it the best, doesn't it?

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No because best implies it's good. Least bad doesn't transmit the same message as best.

Yeah that's fair.

[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

NixOS. My entire config is source-controlled and I can easily roll back to a previous boot image if something breaks like cough Nvidia drivers. I also use it for my home router and all self-hosted services.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

maniacally laughs while trying to avoid eye contact with 19k lines of nix config

[–] dwt@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Out of all the ways that I have tried in the past, to reproduce not just the initial state, but also the ongoing changes of a disto (ansible, saltstack, chef, bunch of Shell scripts) — nix is by far the shortest. With all of these technologies I would never have dreamed to do this for a single Maschine. But now it’s not only possible, but actually gasp enjoyable!

Mind you, if that is not the problem you want to solve, maybe install just the nix package manager in addition to your distribution, and learn to enjoy it without having to run your whole distribution this way.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 3 months ago

You misunderstand! It has also turned into basically a hobby (and recently, a job, lol) to manage nix configs.

Those 19k lines are clean, well-structured and DRY, and do describe every little thing about ca. 30 machines.

[–] leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago

I don't know that it is objectively the best - but its the best fit for me right now (LMDE).

[–] dhampirdamsel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

I've been enjoying EndeavourOS over the past three years. It works wonderfully out of the box at default settings, and was really easy for me to use and set up to my liking with minimal know-how needed.

It also works really well on the variety of machines I have in my home. My desktop, modded Chromebook, and my husband's laptop.

It's allowed me to get more familiar and confident with the command line, and enough so that I've switched to Sway from XFCE (and previously KDE).

[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

I'm convinced it isn't.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

This week alone I've used Arch, Ubuntu, OpenSuse, and Fedora. Its Arch. By a short way, and mostly thanks to the wiki. Tbh they are all converging, and I go with KDE variants when I use a GUI and no distro does too much to customise it

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

Mine's the best, because it fits with what I want. Might not be your best, but it's mine.

[–] poinck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

For a long time I considered Gentoo the best, because I know my things around there. A month ago I said goodbye to my last Gentoo installation in favour for Debian trixie (the next stable release). Gentoo was too time consuming despite the binary repo.

If it would be my job to maintain a Gentoo system I would gladly accept, but there should be a need for it by the users. Otherwise I would just recommend Debian stable or Fedora.

My favourite is Debian over Fedora, because I often don't need the latest versions of a software. And there is flatpak.

[–] randomwords@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago

Void made Linux fun again for me. It gets so much right with the rolling release model.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

It works, has the packages I need and they are up-to-date

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago

It's extremely stable, and countless other distros are derived from this.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

Because it was my first distro that got me away from Windows. And yes, it's Mint.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I use NixOS, btw (don't you see that glorious gif?). It's the only distro that is actually different compared to other distros. It's not just another package manager, another ubuntu skin, or a different desktop environment. If you learn how to configure it, you can easily redo breaking changes or install an exact copy of your system on a different device. You can configure all you want and you will never ever have to worry.

Also has better flex than Arch users.

cons

  • burj khalifa learning curve
  • arch documentation * -1 doc quality (dogshit documentation)
  • doesnt work outta the box
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago

It's super cool to be able to copy a single or maybe two configuration files from one box to another, sync thing your home folder and have an exact copy.

It's super cool to temporarily install things with nix-shell. I have little environments set up where I write python or rust or edit videos and if I'm not in that environment none of those commands even exist.

Updating in vanilla is pretty straightforward. Update your base channel, rebuild. But if you install say home manager as a flake that doesn't update the same way. And then if you do it as an environmental install it doesn't update the same way. And then it's totally possible to do an update get a new version of your web browser, But your auto starts or your PWA's point to the old version of the web browser. My personal favorite is when I update signal. It upgrades the database. Field binary is no longer capable of running but is still the default for some reason. I have to look up the command expunge it from the store, simply finding it in the store isn't trivial.

Most distros have gotten easy to the point of being boring. We don't suffer that fate in Nix.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

openSUSE Slowroll and Secureblue are my favorites ATM. Slowroll for gaming, Secureblue for mobile device. Both are hardened for security because that matters to me.

[–] Beanie@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Because I like compiling everything from source for a 0.2% speed improvement

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I use Arch since approximately 2006 or so. I like its stability (yes!), performance, rapid updates and technical simplicity. It never stands in my way and it's fairly simple to understand, administer and modify. It's probably the most convenient OS I've ever used - sure it takes time/effort to set it up but once you're past that it's smooth sailing. It also doesn't change dramatically over the years (it doesn't need to) so it's easy to keep up with its development. Plus, I have a custom setup script for it that installs and sets up all of the basics, so if I ever need to reinstall, I'm not starting from zero.

I am eyeing NixOS as "the next step" but didn't yet experiment with it too much. Arch is just too comfy to use and the advantages that NixOS brings aren't yet significant enough for me to make any kind of switch to it, but I consider NIxOS (as well as its related technologies like the Nix package manager) to be the most interesting and most advanced things in the Linux world currently.

If you're reading this as a newbie Linux user: probably don't use any of the two mentioned above (yet). They're not considered entry-level stuff, unless you're interested in learning low-level (as in: highly technical) Linux stuff from the start already. NixOS/Nix in particular is fairly complex and can be a challenge even for veteran Linux admins/users to fully understand and utilize well. Start your journey with more common desktop distros like Mint, Fedora, Kubuntu.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Because I can hit "next" a couple of time and have a working install

[–] jakeCubes@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Can't say it's the best, but I love Alpine. It's light, fast, versatile and easy to use, runs on anything, and despite it being used mostly in containers and VMs, it makes for a great desktop distro aswell. :)

[–] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Really? I guess everyone was 15 at some point and hadn't heard that distro wars are useless 🤣

There is no best. Period.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nobara: It works well most of the time and has pretty much everything needed for gaming preinstalled. I had a bad update once that prevented booting past the command line though. Now that I'm more experienced I'd probably use a more mainline distro and install the gaming stuff myself.

[–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's decent, but screw using someone's personal distro. Glorious literally dropped every scrap of his default de config, and switched to another. No transition, no migration, just deleted everything and went on with his day.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›