this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
16 points (76.7% liked)

science

203 readers
1 users here now

Discuss the latest science news, original research papers, and connect with fellow enthusiasts.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dubious article that misrepresents the study it references, and even relies on 'social media posts' for certain claims. What a joke.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I just thought it was important to post because nobody is really talking about it, sorry if I've posted misinformation.

I read the study you posted, still sounds bad but doesn't seem to mention current reversal at all.

Also your study seems to be by 'A.S., R.C., E.O., V.G.-G., A.T., and A.C.N.G. designed research; A.S., A.N., E.O., V.G.-G., R.S., M.R.M., T.S., and F.A.H. performed research; A.S., E.O., and V.G.-G. analyzed data; and A.S. wrote the paper with contributions from all co-authors.'

the article references Spanish marine scientists at 'El Institut de Ciències del Mar'.

Just wondering if you've posted the right one?

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In this false article, they directly mention 'The development, which was confirmed by Spanish marine scientists at El Institut de Ciències del Mar (ICM-CSIC) in Barcelona, has triggered widespread alarm among climate scientists due to its potential to accelerate global warming and destabilise weather patterns worldwide.'

So yes, several of the authors in the Rising Surface Salinity article are from Institut de Ciències del Mar, like Estrella Olmedo and Verónica González‐Gambau, for example.

[–] G4Z@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the info.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was posted June 30 and the article says the study in question was posted July 2, so I think it is a different one.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

My guess is that, whoever wrote the article on intellinews (the author isn't mentioned by name, red flag #1), was referencing the date they saw a related social media post, which prompted them to create this alarmist bullshit for ad revenue.