this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
490 points (98.8% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7451 readers
207 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The family of a Canadian national who supported Donald Trump’s plans for mass deportations of immigrants say they are feeling betrayed after federal agents recently detained the woman in California while she interviewed for permanent US residency – and began working to expel her from the country.

“We feel totally blindsided,” Cynthia Olivera’s husband – US citizen and self-identified Trump voter Francisco Olivera – told the California news station KGTV. “I want my vote back.”

Cynthia Olivera, a 45-year-old mother of three US-born children, thus joined a growing list of examples contradicting the Trump administration’s claims that the immigration crackdown it has spearheaded since the president’s return to the Oval Office in January has prioritized targeting dangerous criminals.

Well, Canadian, obviously a commie with the healthcare etc

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrambinagStoneboots@lemmy.world 134 points 4 weeks ago
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 94 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Good memes in this thread that I’m saving for future use y’all, keep em coming.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 78 points 4 weeks ago

imagine being a grown ass adult and being surprised by this

imagine also thinking you're entitled to sympathy from anyone after voting for literally this

those people can go fuck themselves. i'm glad they're suffering

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 73 points 4 weeks ago
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 70 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

surprised MAGAchu noises

Racist white people dont consider themselves immigrants, they use ex pat because they themselves use immigrant in a derogatory way

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 28 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In 2024, toward the end of his presidency, Joe Biden’s administration granted her a permit allowing her to work legally in the US

But voted Trump and probably blames Biden for this

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The hatred towards non whites really resonated with her. They were supposed to go after them not people like her.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Funny thing is the husband is Hispanic.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago

Fuck these people.

They should have listened to what all of us were telling them constantly.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 25 points 4 weeks ago

Opa leopard style!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Blindsided lol.

[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 18 points 4 weeks ago

Tater tots and prayers.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Votes should be revokable, I've always liked the idea of liquid democracy.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a step in the right direction, but ultimately, the best solution would be an imperative mandate. I have no idea how we've let ourselves get gaslit that free mandates (once someone is elected they can do what they want, regardless of voter intention) is somehow more democratic than imperative mandates.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Arguably, Trump IS following an imperative mandate. This is what his voters want. This is what he promised them

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Haven't seen this posted in a while. I forgot you can delegate your vote to different people for different issues. How is the "category" of an issue decided though?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be up to the delagator? Wouldn't they just decide case by case?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Then the delegator has to vote/delegate on every issue-- they don't need expertise themselves like in a direct democracy, but it is still an issue due to sheer vote volume.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah pretty much. You trust your guy until you change your mind or feel that you need to change your vote. Not really seeing a problem with that.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don't think you're understanding my point. If, as you said, you have to assign a delegate "case by case" for every vote, then you have to vote in every vote. This comes with all the problems of getting people to vote on things now, but 100x as bad because of how many votes there would be.

[–] redsunrise@programming.dev 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I love this idea, but the main obstacle this has to overcome is the voter's knowledge of the issues and any given candidate stances on them. If we implemented this in the US, I feel like most people would still simply delegate all their votes to one candidate or all candidates of a particular party. It's a lot of information for a working person to keep track of. Any idea on how to overcome this with paper ballots? Or are computerized ballots with all relevant information embedded within the way to go?

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Even if most people just delegate their votes in an uninformed way, a liquid democracy would be more resilient to issues coming from that because people can change their votes after casting them.

I'm not sure what kinds of solutions other people have come up with, but personally what I think could be practical is an institution either like a bank, or possibly even incorporated into banks. They already have mature infrastructure for the secure handling of financial data and systems against fraud.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 3 weeks ago
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

dumb fucks.

what did they actually think would happen? the shit he said he was going to do was going to be directed at everyone but them because they were "special"?

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, because they are special... Only brown, dirty, poor people would get kicked out or dissapeared. They are ok with that. They have money so evidently it would not affect them.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

"wont deport me, I'm white"

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

The mental gymnastics these people engage in to completely ignore how fascists work is mind numbing.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 10 points 4 weeks ago
[–] renamon_silver@lemmy.wtf 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A stunning turn of events for sure.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 3 points 4 weeks ago

Nobody could have predicted this.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

First one of these I've seen where they actually regret it when their family gets dragged away.

[–] venoft@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

But but but, we're not brown!

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

LOL! They're a bunch of racist neo-Nazi fucks. If the Cynthia tries to get Francisco to Canada, Canadian Immigration should deny them.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I hope she gets deported.

[–] Xande@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Muhahahahahahaha...

FAFO!

No mercy...

[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

“It’s a big club! And you ain’t in it.”

[–] unabart@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago

And the leopards shall feast upon the carrion!

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

No takebacksies. No mercy. Get fucked.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Don't worry, by 2028 they'll be all-in on whoever the fascist ghoul is without a lick of self-reflection. Even if it's Trump again.

[–] goombakid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Not one to be super religious, but I think Galatians 6:7 fits well here.

"Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows."

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Sorry, no Second Brexit.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Votes for harsh immigration laws.

Sees Canadian getting fucked by immigration laws.

"Wait! I meant brown people! Immigration laws against Brown people! Trump betrayed us!"

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

I guess shes going back to... squints at screen Cambodia.