this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

6894 readers
1018 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/24142922

archived (Wayback Machine)

Carbon credits have often been based on non-existent contracts with local people, or used for land-grabbing, or reforestation projects in which trees were not maintained and were soon cut down or eaten by cows, or otherwise fraudulent. In any case, letting humans take credit for photosynthesis is flawed emissions accounting, and the price of each credit is much lower than the social and environmental cost of the emissions that it offsets.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 month ago

Allowing corporations to greenwash themselves is already too much. Let's not allow countries to do it.

[โ€“] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And as usual -because it's all about diversion anyway- we are talking about the wrong topic.

Carbon credits aren't the problem. Making cheaper and climate-damaging production more expensive artificially so climate-friendly alternatives make sense economically is the whole point.

The problem (the actual one they don't want to publically talk about) is that those credits are far too cheap at best, just a total scam at worst. And that's intentional... thus the constant diversion by discussion much less important details.

[โ€“] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

I'd say these issues are fundamental with "carbon credits" unless there is a reliable global authority that can ensure these credits to actually reflect the emissions of a country vs. the permissible emissions under the 1.5ยฐC goal.

We need to establish such an authority before we start dealing in "carbon credits" globally. Until then they can only be dealt in locally, assuming that locally the values are actually realistic.

[โ€“] BigShammy80@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, there is no point in making regulations and give max values if anyone can buy themself free...