this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
291 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12831 readers
631 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] salacious_coaster 79 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Lol, wow. Not even Ford's CEO will drive a Ford anymore. The US is going to crash so hard

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Entirely agree. It’s worth noting here that ford doesn’t make any ~~cars~~sedans anymore. Crossovers and trucks only. Profit over product led them here.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Once you've met a few CEOs, you quickly realize that most of them literally don't use or even get close to their own product unless someone else is showing them.

[–] draughtcyclist@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jim Farley has been quite open about EVs - and he's been conducting hands-on market research. He's done podcasts on the topic.

I don't know why everyone grabs their pitchforks for this - they're trying to address competition to modernize their offerings.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Honestly, if I was a Ford shareholder, I would be dumping my shares as fast as possible - there's no coming back from an open admission of defeat like that. He flat out said they can't win, the barriers of entry are too high, and the key one (software like Xiaomi) doesn't even really exist yet.

As others point out, the western automakers did this to themselves. Hoo boy did China out capitalism. Ironic

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like the US is gonna be the cheap labor very shortly.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Russia style petrostate feels the most likely. And in a time where fossil fuels are going through their death spiral (if in a somewhat prolonged manner).

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you had even a tiny brain in your head you would see he's driving it to test out the competition. The article says he's made a lot of trips to China this year to look at their ev cars.

[–] JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

See. I see this as the ceo version of "market research". It could bring something better.

Tbh, maybe it's because I just watched 'Ford vs Ferrari', but imo I would want the higher ups to acknowledge they are fucking up and then change it.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think it's market research though said research can look like this. The messaging doesn't seem to line up.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

So you have an opinion based off an ad disguise as a movie you watched, you’re surely gonna love that new F1 movie for certain you love advertisement so much

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The F150 is America’s best selling vehicle and has been for the last 40+ years.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but the dynamics of demand is rapidly changing. Look at the micromobility sector - there was nothing 5ish years ago, and now scooter and ebikes are everywhere.

the only thing keeping Chinese vehicles out are trade restrictions. Look at Europe: VW is in dire straights because they can't compete with Chinese EVs.

[–] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

To be fair, VW is in it mainly because of Diesel gate and the several billions they owe because of it, but yeah as a consequence they also severely lack innovation especially in EVs

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, we live in a post-truth society where the vast majority of people have traded the pursuit of truth for the comfort of confirmation bias.

And the last 6 months have shown us that the stock market is mostly just vibes and manipulation rather than being grounded in facts and reality.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Ford stock has always been a terrible investment. Its PE ratio is a single digit for good reason.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago

Why is it humbling? The US and EU actively hindered EV development when they weren’t ignoring it entirely. Put this man back in preschool so he can learn cause and effect, because this is nonsense. Or he’s lying for any number of reasons, which is my guess.

[–] alyth@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Who cares about some billionaire's opinion. I would assume he restructured his portfolio and wants to see some gains.

[–] noredcandy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Fwiw a lot of late stage CEOs even of big companies are way less rich than you’d think. Jim Farleys net worth is 21 million dollars. Still very very rich, but not billionaire rich.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In response to the title, he better be driving the competitors vehicles often to understand what they are doing well.

I think this is a classic case of a company being unable to disrupt itself.

Ford makes internal combustion engines. Ford makes F-150s. Undoubtedly every executive, marketing guy, R&D engineer, and factory worker is focused on how many F-150s are being produced and sold. Anybody who shows up to a meeting suggesting they don't sell more F150 is booted out the door (metaphorically).

They probably also thought there's no way a Chinese mobile phone / tea kettle / Wi-Fi router manufacturer could ever kick their ass with a car. Yet here we are.

[–] fannymcslap@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ford also sell a shit ton of electric vehicles.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

They seem to be aggressively discontinuing non elect vehicles. Fiesta and Mondeo are gone, Focus is discontinued this year.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Lightning is still stupid expensive but I’d love to have one

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I had to budget a lot to get mine and I fucking love it. I do wish there was a design choice or an after market mod that would allow me to sacrifice some of that frunk space for better visibility.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Doug Ford can go fuck himself!

What? Of course I read the headline. The point still stands!

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

That fucker should burn at a pyre with all the other lobbyists.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I have a lot of respect for him for this, telling everyone that your company makes a bad product and needs to do better is a bold move.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He "doesn't want give up it"?

Hey, out of curiosity, whats your opinion on NATO?

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago