this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Climate Change

285 readers
1 users here now

This is a no agenda less moderated variation of !climate@slrpnk.net. Moderation power is not abused and mods do not suppress ideas in order to control the narrative.

Obvious spam, uncivil posts and misinfo are not immune to intervention, but on-topic civil posts are certain to not be subject to censorship (unlike the excessive interventalism we see in the other climate community).

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archived (Wayback Machine)

Most of these emissions were from fossil fuels and industry.

This statement is extremely misleading, but also not surprising.

The animal exploitation industry is the leading cause of climate change.

A Critical Look at UN IPCC's Emissions Accounting

From the above:

Mainstream climate spokespeople are now promoting this “green growth” story and recommending the rapid phaseout of fossil fuels. This is dangerous because the world can expect a 50% increase in global warming ERF in the short term if such rapid phaseout recommendations are actually implemented without addressing the Cow in the Room as most government policies are currently configured. This is suicidal.

If and when Hansen et al.’s calculation that the cooling impact of SO2 has been underestimated by 1 W/m2 in IPCC AR6 is validated, then the cooling gases co-emitted with fossil fuel combustion would result in 2.3 W/m2 of cooling ERF from fossil fuel sources alone. Then, phasing down fossil fuel use rapidly would cause anthropogenic global warming ERF to rapidly increase from 2.6 W/m2 to 4.9 W/m2, an 87% increase in a matter of a few weeks.

related: Global Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed? (Hansen et al, 2025)

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here