this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
462 points (94.9% liked)

Fuck AI

3656 readers
526 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't that comic AI slop as well? O.o

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Very unlikely IMO. One speech bubble is the mirror image of the other with a different aspect ratio, which suggests human editing to me. I can't see any GenAI hallmarks.

Edit: I wasn't aware how much this comic style is typified in AI image generation. I've changed my wager - bar the speech bubble edits, this is probably AI.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My only guess here is that someone manually added the text because AI is usually terrible at adding that, but I’m guessing it’s nearly certainly AI generated

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Thanks - did my own reverse image search off the back of this and it's mad how many similar images exist. Like you say, I think in this case the text has been edited in, but I agree it does seem likely that the only other human intervention was artists having their style stolen.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It didn't jump out right away as AI to me because it's a bit blurry and has almost pure white speech bubbles. Notice all the other AI examples have that dirty yellowish tint over everything. The weird hand up gesture by the robot combined with how much it looks like the other AI comics clinches it, though, and the speech bubbles are white because someone edited them in. Good sleuthing!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

"Young lady, I am an expert on humans!"

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Beep woop woop woop

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

An actual human did that to my dad

[–] teft@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Situs inversus is a condition where your organs are mirrored internally compared to the majority of humans. Most people don’t know they have it until they have appendicitis or break a rib or need chest xrays.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Is single-port laparoscopic an option for an appendectomy? That'd put an incision on the left.

There's also situs inversus.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

This is just fucking AI. What are we even doing here? Stop fucking posting it!

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

is that image 404 now? can't seem to access it, even with the direct url

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a bug in Lemmy, every so often it just refuses to show images for no reason at all. Try shift-reload.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's there now, thanks

just odd that it wasn't available from your servers image cache when I wrote that

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I have no idea what the underlying cause might be. It seems like a strange kind of bug to have.

[–] TRock@feddit.dk 2 points 1 month ago

I can see it

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago