Share interesting Technology news and links.
Rules:
To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:
More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.
Encouraged:
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
More Context
...which has advanced reasoning...
Does he actually believe this sort of shit?
Like his constant nattering about self-driving cars or brain/computer interface (or DOGE cost-cutting for that matter). It's all bludgeoningly obvious bullshit, but I can't work out if he's more dishonest or delusional.
I lean a bit toward delusional — that to at least some notable degree, he actually believes the bullshit he spouts.
It's creepy either way.
He uses "advanced" relatively.
Grok's reasoning is probably more advanced than Elon's
"I'm going to use a model trained on incorrect data, to correct the data, and then train on that data."
I can't really comment first hand, but people I know that are heavy in the AI arena career-wise have told me that Grok is pretty much garbage on all fronts.
Is that true?
@grok analysis!
/s
It's going to refine it's capability until it just starts calling everyone "pedoguy" and stating they are in the Epstein files regardless of the question posed to it.
But he apparently posted a clean drug test the other day! He can't be on coke NOW. /s
World history according to Elon Musk:
Hitler was right.
The End
Dude is over there literally trying to shoddily doodle his preferred reality onto the inside of his own little bubble.
The most liked comment under the third post is straight up holocaust denial.
So much ado for the modern equivalent of burning down a library.
Which probably also already happened to train it in the first place. Article is about Anthropic, but xAI would do the same if they could.
I guess that's right.
Just that what I meant by "burning down a library" was the loss of information that would occur as a result.
Referring to historical events of burning down libraries, of which I can recall 2 of. One being the Library of Alexandria and the other being Nalanda Mahavihara.
In the modern day, where stuff is digitised and mass printed, burning books is not really going to cost loss of said information (much less, scanning it, which would cause nothing except potential loss of revenue to the publisher).
On the other hand, if you fill the internet with a bunch of false information, such that someone just looking something up, will see the false information way before the actual thing, that would have a similar (even worse) effect on the civilisation.
