this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

science

20774 readers
864 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It’s only a matter of time, decades perhaps, until someone/group makes a virus to reduce human births using similar approaches .

Their motives might be good or bad or both, but it’s going to happen

Please do. Add it to Bud Light.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Genophage now

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

And fascists will see an excellent opportunity for eugenics.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"It's really important to note that the gene isn't incorporated into the DNA of the cat. It's not incorporated into the genome. So the gene isn't passed on to offspring. It basically floats in the nucleus of the muscle cell and the normal machinery of the nucleus makes the protein that we need at very high levels," Swanson said.

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What offspring? If they're made sterile

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I only read the article, not the study. I would imagine this refers to the small percentage that would not be sterilized by this. Rarely are things 100% effective