this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
4 points (61.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33863 readers
594 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are a couple of governance systems in the world. Parliamentary democracy, direct democracy, anarcho syndicalism, etc.

With its decentralized nature, mostly free movement between communities and instances, which governance system would be closest?

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Libb@jlai.lu 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I would say a... federation? ;)

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A federation of absolute dictatorships. Some are more enlightened than others but if an instance bans you there is no independent appeal process.

[–] pleasestopasking@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which I would argue matters less when it's so easy to move to a different "country" and still participate in everything with little meaningful difference.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes of course. In the broadest sense. Thanks for pointing it out though. :)

I am more interested in which aspects of the broader system resemble which systems we know of.

For example, lemmy has countless instances, some are part of the fedipact, others arent, others again are part of fediseer, joinlemmy.org, etc.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, federations are a broad political system ranging from say, Switzerland (or even Germany) to much larger collections like the USA, the Federation of Russia, or the EU itself (which Germany is also part of). It can also be considered in variety of forms, say the UK is not officially a federation (not that I'm aware of at least) but it's also a collection of various and at time very diverging populations and countries/states/regions, not all of them subject of to the exact same exact laws.

[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

say the UK is not officially a federation (not that I’m aware of at least) but it’s also a collection of various and at time very diverging populations and countries/states/regions

Sorry for being that kind of nerd but I have to somehow, the UK is a unitary state, pretty much the opposite of a federation. Meaning regional powers are granted by the central government not inherited from its component parts.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

Don't apologize for correcting my mistakes. I was not sure about that, and was indeed wrong. Thx for pointing it out :)

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

thats a pretty awesome explanation. Thanks. :)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 2 points 1 month ago

You're welcome ;)

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A decentralised conglomerate of independent city states, which have internally variable governmental systems

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty convincing. Thanks for answering. The city states' infrastructure is built and maintainer by a small faction who also controls the police (by default, not unchangeably so).

The larger group is kinda syndicalist in nature, no? Because members build things like the fediseer and adoption is bottom up, not top down.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I don't think you can apply that here as each Lemmy instance is its own independent system with no reliability on others Lemmy systems.

An admin of LW has no bearing on the operation of ml and any disagreement turns in one side sticking their fingers in their ears saying "I don't hear you"

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Formally, it's the Alliance to Restore the Republic. Mon Mothma is the Alliance's Chancellor, which is a sort of association of rebel cells spread across the galaxy. So she's sort of elected by the leadership of each rebel cell.

Then on the starship side, it basically seems like anyone with a ship gets promoted to general and promised back pay once the Republic is restored. It's sort of a gamble, but it beats smuggling spice and contraband.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 month ago

its kinda awesome and exactly what I expected from lemmy folks! Thank you very much.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The situation of international anarchy in which individual states exist. Except there's nobody dying in wars on Lemmy. And not even anyone dying indirectly yet, as far as I can tell, although any time you let people talk to each other there's a continual risk of it happening.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The kid who blew up a fertility clinic (and himself) in Palm Springs was a moderator of !antinatalism@lemmy.world, for what that's worth. Not a war, and the only fatality ended up being himself, but definitely an act of violence with an intent to kill that was connected to a specific community on this platform.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

Oh really? I didn't know that. Okay, never mind. But, like I said, it was inevitable.

Yep, giving it a quick look, that definitely does look like the account of a deeply miserable person.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I declare myself Huey Tlatoani. I expect tribute from y'all by the end of the day.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please link a source to your title's explanation so we can address you accordingly. :D

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Aztec Emperor. Tlatoani translates to "he who speaks" when you add Huey/Hueyi it means "grand/great".

I covet the turquoise diadem and a cloak of quetzal feathers.

Wikipedia

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Claims to be Emperor, doesn't have the turquoise diadem? Pff.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You try finding a qualified lapidarist in 2025. You can't Fiver that. Nobody wants to work anymore. I'm good for the cacao beans needed to pay the bill.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 month ago

Love it! I swear my fealty to you then. Have a nice day oh grand Mister Neon!