this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

It's A Digital Disease!

23 readers
1 users here now

This is a sub that aims at bringing data hoarders together to share their passion with like minded people.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
The original post: /r/datahoarder by /u/xenobitex on 2025-06-13 02:45:59.

Hi - Asking for the purpose of making more compact back-ups... I'm keeping the source of course! For normal video editing I've been keeping to mod-8. But recently, for DVD archiving I moved to mod-16 (it seemed a "safer" choice"...). So I crop pointless black / cover noisy edges leaving up to 6/8 pixel borders at edges.

However... I recently discovered x264 blurs edges if there are black bars + picture contained within a 16x16 macroblock... the black borders I retained or added.

(...apparently x264 assigns a higher quantizer to the whole macroblock due to the static black, so the valid picture content gets encoded with a lower quality and becomes slightly blurred within those 16 edge pixels. This is more noticeable when the picture at the edges has a uniform color/texture etc).

So... asking some pros... what are the actual benefits of cropping black/noise to anything above mod-2 (in 2025)?

I'm aware encoding just pads "invisible" pixels to make any video back up to mod-16 - at some expense to efficiency - but is it worth just going a mod-2 route while cropping, if genuine quality is lost by cropping noise and adding borders to keep mod-8/16 instead?

(How does this padding work with the macroblocks? Any downsides at all?)

* What I'm cropping varies between huge black 4:3 letterboxing, VHS capture noise, to just MPEG-2 DCT edge blurring on high quality pro DVDs. But it seems doing so adds its own edge issues.

Thanks in advance!

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here