this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
127 points (97.7% liked)

News

36909 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing plane down again. I'm looking for sources on how many of which manufacturer has gone down recently, will update when i find it.

Edit

It's such a new model that i can't find it in the database on airsafe

According to IATA interactive safety report 2024, there hasn't been a fatal accident that involved a 787-8 Dreamliner up until 2024-12-31. Can't find any collected data for 2025.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coldgoron@lemmy.zip 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a lot of talk of casualties on the ground too. Absolute tragedy.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Yeah, apparently the plane crashed into the dining hall for a medical school, so a ton of potential first responders were likely among the injured. It's kind of hard to imagine how this could have turned out any worse.

[–] camr_on@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Very sad. I think that's the first 787 crash?

[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think so. I haven't found any previous fatal accidents from IATA.

Just had a look at a forum for pilots in Sweden. Seems like they think it was human error, due to the short runway and how the plane seemed to have stalled in the videos. Speculations to be sure, so I'm gonna wait and see what the investigation says.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

My brother is a pilot (not commercial, but was working on his hours for a long time before deciding he didn’t want to) and we were talking about this through text. He told me this:

It’s the first crash of a 787 in something like 14 years and with over 1200 examples flying worldwide. I’ve watched the video several times and much doesn’t add up with this crash. Speculation as to a cause is futile at this point but the cause will be determined relatively quickly as the tail section with the recorders is intact. Reading a bit online, it would appear to be some sort of an electrical failure, likely due to an engine(s) issue which is just astronomically rare (to lose both engines). The RAT appears to be deployed, again, indicating an electrical issue. Additionally, the landing gear are tilted back which would appear to indicate a hydraulics failure. All of this leads one to believe a dual engine failure…again, astronomically rare.

[–] darvocet 5 points 9 months ago

I'm a private pilot and i can say too early to tell. Plane exceeded the critical angle of attack it looked like in the video, but tail sections of the plane being mostly intact could mean they flew it to the ground like you're supposed to and didn't stall it. It wasn't gaining altitude though and so thrust issues seem possible.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is a lot of insane gore about this on the internet, people taking pictures of severed heads and stuff, don't look it up for your sanity. The plane fell on a med school dormitory, killed a whole bunch of students in addition to those on board.

Some people say that the RAT (an emergency device to power the plane in case of double engine failure) can be heard after takeoff, while the engines were silent. There is a lot of people claiming the flaps were not correctly extended, but there is no way to know that properly from the published videos, and the takeoff flap config of this plane is not that discernible from a distance from the flaps up config anyway.

The plane was 13 years old, so it's not likely that it's Boeing to blame for this.

It's too early to say anything and to speculate.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I like your well reasoned and controlled response, its a light in darkness

Having said that, I do feel that we're at a point where we can start with assuming that Boeing did something bad because Boeing always does something bad. Yes, that is a bad way to think and I hate that I do, but here we are

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Oh, yeah, totally. Fuck Boeing. That this is likely not Boeing's fault does not mean that they are not rotten nevertheless.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

Seen a few videos from on the ground, horrifying stuff : (.

RIP to all those involved.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Is it a Boeing?

Is it a Boeing?

Oooofff course its a Boeing, and of course its a dream liner.

That court case that would cripple Boeing, and was cancelled by Trump, might need to be spun up again

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Thank God. Airbus is still safe to fly on