this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
155 points (98.1% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1209 readers
668 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/Adventurous-Tip1174 At 2025-06-07 10:58:31 PM | Source


top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The last point is so creepy. So they are allowed to kill other countries’ civilians?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

It literally is

[–] Gobo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's worrying...

"you must follow legal orders" does not imply "you must refuse illegal orders"

Without a broader reading this section implies that obeying illegal orders is optional... which also implies it'll be on the service member to prove the order they disobeyed was illegal, at their court martial. Which puts a lot of pressure on them to do what they're told, they have to be really certain the order is illegal 🫤

[–] Gobo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

When I was in the army during basic they even said, you can object to an illegal order, but if pressed you need to follow it. State the objection for the record and that will come out in whatever investigation could follow.