this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
145 points (98.0% liked)

News

100 readers
17 users here now

News Stories

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

http://archive.today/2025.06.08-025637/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/07/us/trump-national-guard-deploy-rare.html

President Trump took extraordinary action on Saturday by deploying 2,000 National Guard troops to quell immigration protesters in California, making rare use of federal powers and bypassing the authority of the state’s governor, Gavin Newsom.

Governors almost always control the deployment of National Guard troops in their states. But according to legal scholars, the president has the authority under Title 10 of the United States Code to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress “any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.”

In a presidential memo, Mr. Trump said, “To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.”

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement on Saturday night that President Trump was deploying soldiers in response to “violent mobs” that she said had attacked federal law enforcement and immigration agents. The 2,000 troops would “address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,” she said.

Protests have occurred Friday and Saturday in California to oppose federal immigration raids on workplaces in California. The latest incident was at a Home Depot in Paramount, Calif., about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles.

Mr. Newsom, a Democrat, immediately rebuked the president’s action, indicating that Mr. Trump had usurped his own state authority.

Mr. Trump suggested deploying U.S. forces in the same manner during his first term to suppress outbreaks of violence during the nationwide protests over the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis.

He opted against doing so at the time, but he has repeatedly raised the idea of using troops to secure border states.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"states rights" was always a lie

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only applies to certain states

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And certain people in those states

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago
[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Someone smarter than me...what's likely going to happen? I feel like this can't end well. And I also feel like the retaliation against CA is only going to escalate.

I hope the people down there are armed and ready to fight.

[–] goldenquetzal@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If Newsom does not invoke* the 10th amendment, claim government overreach, and get Congress involved within the next 48 hours, effectively that is the final nail in the coffin for authoritarianism to be fully in place here. California is the cornerstone for state level push back and resistance and this is the precursor with that EO to an occupation of that state. No other states are going to stand up to this government the way Cali could. This is the final marker for whether we collapse fully into fascism or not, and so far Newsom is letting it happen. Musk, as disgusting as he is, capitulating to Trump with that scuffle was also a massive indicator that Trump's power is still beyond the wealthiest oligarch. He's our Putin and so far the last bet we have is giving up before it began.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

Death Camps

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

People are going to die and it's going to continue to get worse, just as Project 2025 intended.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

"Quell" is false.

They were sent to escalate