Of course that shithead would
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
There is a $44B NG/LNG project they have approved but no one wants to buy. It would have a 1Trillion cf NG per year capacity. For 10%/year "payback" needs $4.40 operating profit per mmbtu, which is more than than current price of NG.
NG is a declining use commodity in the world, with EU and China having 10% reductions for electricity last year. Russia and Australia can supply Asia from existing facilities, and even US gulf coast has too much export capacity relative to future demand, and easier expansion possibilities/commitments. There is no room for this new project even if "allies" are subjugated to buying from US.
Thanks for the reality check. I had wondered about NG. One of my first IT jobs was for a place that made burners to vent the waste from drilling. Wasn't profitable then, wondered if it was now. BTW, John Zinc in Tulsa, OK also designed burners for the Third Reich. Yeah, they don't talk about that, but old people that worked there knew.