this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
497 points (92.2% liked)

Cyberstuck

1069 readers
1 users here now

A place to post your Cybertruck fails! We're here to make fun of this hunk of shit and throw as much shade as we can to that garbage bag of a human elon.

No doxxing No slurs No racism And no fucking nazis!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Holy shit those useless piles of nazi garbage cost 200k???

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)

You bad they didn't get GAP insurance

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BMW_stick@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Good point.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

What the fuck is wrong with US insurance?! This person's poor vehicle choices aside, when I insure my vehicle in Australia, we (the insurance company and I) agree an insured value when I take out the insurance. They set the cost based on that agreed value and a few other things. Then if my car is written off they pay me the agreed value plus any other costs covered. What's this agreed market value nonsense? Why would anyone agree to that for a financed vehicle?

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

You can get insurance that covers what you owe regardless of the actual value of the vehicle; insurance companies are presumably going to calculate the cost of that insurance based on the difference between the two. Dude presumably decided it was too expensive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Time to swipe some "trucks".

[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

As someone who has totaled like 4 cars, its never been nearly enough to buy a replacement for that same car.

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

77k + 171k = 198k. This guy should not own anything.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›