this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
356 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

3385 readers
40 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall-free: https://archive.is/8wl6n

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 96 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t this some misuse of power felony?

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

Facism becoming public.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 months ago

This is some Fugitive Slave Act bullshit

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 36 points 2 months ago

Regardless of gender, ethnicity, or age, if the implications of stories like this aren't bothering you, you're failing to grasp the implications.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] AfricanGray@piefed.social 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Government so small it fits in your uterus

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 25 points 2 months ago

"Protecting" women my foot.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don’t cops have jurisdictional boundaries?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Only if they're enforced.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The family reported the person missing so they probably got around it

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps I'm missing this in the article:

Presumably towns, cities, and state agencies are the ones buying these cameras. Are they able to opt out of data sharing or manually control requests? If not, is there anyone working to put these cameras on procurement blacklists?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

The government doesn’t want to blacklist them. These cameras aren’t being misused, this is exactly why they are being installed by cities across the nation. They’re fine with them being used for shit like this because they know that when it comes to go on their own witch hunts, they’ll be able to.

And to top it off, the local politicians in charge of deciding things get a nice kickback from Flock.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damnit, were the sovereign citizens right about not having license plates?!?!!

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Just gotta put a gold fringe on the license plate and then it's not an American license plate it is a Navel license plate and they no longer have jurisdiction.

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Fuck you're right hahahaha