this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
95 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

3729 readers
702 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 42 points 2 months ago

So the article says that it can reduce their lifespan by up to 10 days.

A quick check on the lifespan of the satellite, They claim they're about 5 years.

I'd say the article title got done splainin' to do.

In other news, how can we help the sun do better, 10 days is not enough.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 26 points 2 months ago
[–] warm@kbin.earth 22 points 2 months ago

Keep at it Sun!

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

Gonna have regular Starlink showers at this rate. Should be fun. As long as you don't get hit with debris.

[–] Web_Rand@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 months ago
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Wait—they haven’t taken into account solar pressure and radiation?!?!

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 2 months ago

During solar maximum, the lifetime of a satellite could be reduced by up to 10 days, the researchers say.

I'm sure they have, but it doesn't make a significant difference. The headline is just clickbait.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Direct exposure to the sun? In orbit? Chance in a million!

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago

Even the fusion of hydrogen atoms can't stand musk.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone have full article?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

One charlatan calling out another.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

They DO say sunlight is the best disinfectant. Now hopefully when they tumble out of orbit they exclusively bombard yachts, Tesla distribution centers, and mara-lago.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Is there any other manufacturer who's business plan says "when we're done with everything we have ever made we're going to through it on this bonfire."

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago