this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
512 points (96.4% liked)

Greentext

8064 readers
583 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 161 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This perfectly encapsulates how anti vaxxers and others think. "Ive thought it through and it cantnbebright". Its incredible how we can have access to vast amounts of information and yet live in an age of gleeful ignorance.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 72 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Glue, is how the wings stay on, really good glue

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

hot glue or super glue? I mean super glue has super in the name

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Welding is just extreme hot glue, the hottest glue

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You will trigger a lot of people if you say that welding is gluing

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

It is gluing, but it helps that the glue is hot enough to also melt the glued materials a little bit.

Soldering and brazing really are pretty much gluing, though. Fancy hot glue metal with fine tuned properties for penetration and beading.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dave@feddit.uk 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Any type of glue is fine. Just stay away from the cardboard derivatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The funniest thing is that the aerospace engineers who made this possible are just as much hopeless dysfunctional wrecks as the rest of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This person's grasp of physics is like halfway there. Like one more module and they'd calm the fuck down.

[–] ne0n@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

‘flying for no reason’

‘ignoring gravity’

‘somehow joints don’t break’

Halfway might be overstating it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

"A little knowledge" has never been more dangerous.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 38 points 10 months ago

Wokeness is what keeps them in the air, which is why they're falling out of it now

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 37 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Well I must admit, when the plane is resting on the ground, the wings droop down a lot. Then when airborne it's the other way around, the wings curve upwards as the fuselage hangs from them. In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

But since I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I have learned about material science, airplane design and engineering. And I have found out that it does indeed flex that much. It also isn't that thick, since it's only a skeleton wrapped with a very thin layer of metal. In fact if it didn't flex as much, it would be weaker and not stronger.

So the thing I really learnt is never to trust intuition when it comes to things like this.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago

In my mind nothing that big made of metal should be able to flex that much.

You can observe on a small scale that many things made of metal do, e.g. a saw or a spring.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

i remember when i thought these jokes were funny. now i know tons of people actually think like this and it's depressing rather than funny.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think large planes "look" like they can't work because their "relative speed" is really low


that is, their speed relative to their length. We're used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.

Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...).

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 10 months ago

That's a really thoughtful take, I'm glad you shared. I think it has merit. I think proximity is a factor too. The public rarely gets up close to a jet, but I can attest from personal experience they seem much faster when you're closer during takeoff and landing.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...

Birds flying against the wind and staying in the same spot as a result do look kinda weird though. Especially if you are not aware/don't notice there is strong winds

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I remember a quote from an A380 pilot saying the plane doesn't look like it should be able to fly.

Even the people that fly them know they don't look like a flying object.

[–] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

I get it. That plane is so disgusting the earth tries to keep it as far as possible from the ground.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 26 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

It's more like putting the plane in a bowl of jello and then shaking the bowl.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait till this guy find out that there are more planes in the ocean than there are submarines in the sky

[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, technically pregnant women can be submarines

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've read your comment and I'd like you to know that I don't approve of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Anon, it took one hundred years of trial and errors in design and mechanical failures, resulting in hundreds of deaths, to perfect the dark arts of aviation.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that's out there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago

Don't forget about the screens they put in the windows

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

...fake and gay

Hey now. Let's not blame gay people for the common-sense-defying demon-wizard sorcery that engineers get up to when someone threatens to take away their calculators and caffeine.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

Bruh some of the earliest planes were literally called biplanes. The gay has been complicit in aviation demon magic since the very beginning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

at takeoff i like to imagine that the plane is going into a massive underground subway network with really nice screens along the sides

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›