this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Alternatives to Popular Services

222 readers
1 users here now

A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain assistance for, and critique self-hosted alternatives to our favorite web apps, web...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/selfhosted by /u/jbarr107 on 2025-05-13 12:19:30+00:00.


Dear RustDesk:

As a hobbyist who maintains a small home lab with remote access to 2 users, I would LOVE to self-host the RustDesk Web Client. While I can certainly use the downloaded or deployed clients...

  • I can run RustDesk on a VPS, which I can use to connect to my home lab devices.
  • I can run RustDesk locally on my LAN, which I can use to connect to my home lab devices.

...but man, that Web Client V2 Preview at https://rustdesk.com/web/ is absolutely stellar!

I would love to self-host that Web Client to access my home lab from any browser. Maybe I'd connect it to my home lab with a Cloudflare Tunnel (so I don't have to expose any ports on my router) behind a Cloudflare Application (to provide an extra layer of authentication). Or maybe I'd use other solutions like WireGuard and Authentik.

After contacting RustDesk Support, you confirmed that to self-host the Web Client, I must have a minimum 10-user / 300-device subscription. Obviously, for my hobbyist use of about 4 devices, this is beyond my budget.

So, RustDesk, please consider adding a Community-supported edition of your RustDesk Web Client. It could be free, following the model of TailScale, Portainer, or Kasm, or it could have an affordable annual cost, at a fair level to entice hobbyists.

But please, consider providing a Web Client for hobbyist use.

Thank you,

Jim Barr, a hobbyist who loves testing, using, and promoting useful tech.

(YMMV regarding Cloudflare privacy policies.)

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here