this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
754 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29286 readers
2234 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The judge overseeing the case against the Defense Department's firing of transgender service members revealed that the military spends 8 times more on erectile dysfunction medication than on gender affirming care.

While discussing military spending with the Defense Department (DoD) attorney for the ongoing Talbott v Trump case, Judge Ana Reyes said the DoD spends approximately $5.2 million annually on medical care for service members with gender dysphoria.

Comparatively, the DoD spends $42 million a year on medication for service members with erectile dysfunction.

The US District Judge asked: "It's not even a rounding error, right?"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 254 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Viagra is gender affirming care.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago

So are the T injections conservatives are all taking these days...

Hell, when that one idiot told them to tan their but holes to increase testosterone, that was technically gender affirming care, just not actually effective.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 184 points 10 months ago (2 children)

ED meds are gender affirming care, aren't they? If they are gonna cut it out of military spending, cut all of it out.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

If the administration did that, they would have to deal with a coup d'état the next day. 🤣

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 91 points 10 months ago

Viagra is gender affirming care.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 81 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't viagra gender affirming care?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If God wants you to have a limp dick that is his plan for you!!! How dare you go against God!!! 😆

Dick pills (and hair plugs) are gender affirming, you twats...

[–] BendingHawk@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

100%! If your dick don't work, God doesn't want you using it!!!

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

It was never about the money being spent. It is about othering fellow Americans and creating a Boogeyman for the Fox/OAN/etc. crowd.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering how cheap viagra is, this is actually kind of astonishing.

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

ED can be a long term symptom of traumatic brain injury. TBI is super common for anyone deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Thanks for killing all those middle eastern kids. Here are your allotted dick pills. Oh and, you're not trans are you?"

  • Uncle Sam
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I was under the impression that sex had no place in our military. Why’re they helping service members get boners if they aren’t supposed to be fucking in the first place?

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

On the contrary, the military is very pro getting soldiers to have kids. They incentivize it pretty heavily because a lot of people who serve end up having kids who serve, so they get the generational recommitment out of it

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does the DoD pay for medical treatment of those that have retired? Ive seen some news that viagra also helps treat some problems that arise when the prostate grows too much, like having trouble peeing and some pains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

That is what viagra is.

Makes sense. How can we expect our troops to drop bombs on middle-eastern children if they can't get it up?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Judge Ana Reyes said the DoD spends approximately $5.2 million annually on medical care for service members with gender dysphoria.

Comparatively, the DoD spends $42 million a year on medication for service members with erectile dysfunction.

Its not a small figure, either

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't this make sense though, statistically? Aren't men with ED a much larger portion of the population than people trying to transition?

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I would say that yes, this is expected, but goes to show how much the cost of gender affirming care is being blown out of proportion by the right.

[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] O_R_I_O_N@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The DoD knows how to make a soldier happy; blue pills and hummers ;)

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

And that's just the supply for Hegseth's whiskey dick.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 7 points 10 months ago

$5.2m? They’re probably gonna spend more than that just arguing this case. It’s never been about the money.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] some_dude@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

sigh Everything reminds me of her...

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

they could have gotten generic boner pills for much less money.

have they not seen those commercials?

even a gas station poner pill would cost less.

[–] WeekendClock@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It very likely is generic.

All my meds from the VA are generic.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And some of that Viagra is probably used in sexual assault.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 10 months ago

Peacetime, wartime, on leave.

load more comments
view more: next ›