Enshittification

405 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to Enshittification

A community for everyone who misspelt it as enshitification.

"I the onceler felt sad as I watched them all go, but business is business and business must grow, regardless of crummies in tummies you know."

This is your space to document the decay, demise, and destruction of the tech world as we know it. Share stories, articles, and firsthand experiences that capture the ongoing decline of once-celebrated platforms, services, and companies in the late stage capitalist landscape.

From monopolistic corporate shifts to anti-user updates and the relentless pursuit of profit over quality—if it’s broken, bloated, or just plain bad, it belongs here. We’re here to spotlight the moves that make the tech world worse, one piece of enshittification at a time.

Guidelines
🔹 Stay on Topic: Only post content about the decline of tech products, platforms, or companies.
🔹 Quality Content: Give some context when posting links or articles to drive quality discussions.
🔹 Respectful Discussion: Critique companies, crappy tech, and capital, not community members.
🔹 Positive Monday: The first Monday of every month is reserved for positive content only that shows enshittification isn't inevitable.

Join us to expose the changes that ruin the things we once loved and to discuss what comes next in a tech world gone wrong.

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net

Mark Zuckerberg's Phantom-Friend-Future (davekarpf.substack.com)

submitted 3 months ago by relianceschool@slrpnk.net to c/enshitification@slrpnk.net

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“The average American,” Zuckerberg says, “has fewer than three friends, fewer than three people they would consider friends. And the average person has demand for meaningfully more. I think it's something like 15 friends or something.”

Zuck thinks AI should fill this demand. The future isn’t the Metaverse anymore. The future is Meta’s phantom AIs that will pal around with you and slake your thirst for social interactions. It’s like Mark Zuckerberg heard about Zombie Internet Theory and decided it was a feature, not a bug.

And I guess I’m just curious who possibly wants this future. Who is this for? Why? You have all the money in the world. Why can’t you focus on building something interesting? Or at least just stop degrading your own existing product?

I suspect Mark Zuckerberg’s phantom-friend-network will follow the same route as his ghost-town of a metaverse. He’ll spend tens of billions chasing a future that no one actually wants.

I do not want AI companions to replace or augment my actual friendships. That sounds hollow, pathetic, sad. A world where we have four times as many AI friends as real friends is a world where we have just, collectively, given up.

And I don’t think this is a radical statement either. A future filled with AI companions is plainly a dystopia to be avoided, not a benchmark to strive for.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Who is this for?

Capitalists. People want to commoditize social interactions, corner the market, and then manipulate consumers into spending their money as directed by their phantom friend algorithm.

Think about how much influence you could have if everyone actually started talking to fake friends. "How was the movie?" "Did you watch the game?" "What did you think about the debate?" "Would you like to play a game?"

A lot of people feel isolated and lonely. A leader might see that as an opportunity to bring people together. A capitalist sees an opportunity to enrich himself.

[–] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is an unpopular opinion, but I think shit like this will be read by future generations and they will be like "lol how did they ever submit to these assholes". This is so obviously fucked up and unapplicable.