this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
329 points (99.1% liked)

News

37060 readers
2777 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 64 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Everything is fiiiiiiiine.... I mean we're only talking about:

Alkylated lead compounds

Polycyclic organic matter (POM)

Mercury

Hexachlorobenzene

Polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB)

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDF)

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

So the cancer rates, neurotoxicity rates, kidney and liver disease rates, and general bad for you vibes might keep happening. Its all for progress right?.... Right?

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

wtf leaded gasoline is back too? (there are very few other uses for alkyllead compounds and it would be hard to make it accidentally)

[–] PurpleTentacle@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"I call it beautiful, clean lead. I told my people, never use the word lead unless you put beautiful clean before it."

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they have to make new republicans somehow

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I thought that's what the podcasts are for.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 6 points 11 months ago

That's the paint, the toxins are the primer.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If people don't want these things in their air, why don't they just vote with their wallets and NOT BUY products that create these byproducts, or move to a place that better suits their snowflake-lungs?

Worst case, if you develop cancer after 5 years of exposure, you can exercise your right to sue the company for damages and be made whole again.

We don't need government hamstringing industry when the free market can sort these things out!

/s (because who the fuck knows these days)

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fucking poe's law. I thought you were serious until the last sentence. Even the idea of being made whole isn't something beyond what some fuckers would claim.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

You will actually get some hardcore libertarians unironically making the argument that regulations are completely unnecessary as long as you have a strong court system to award damages in the event that harm is actually done to an individual.

Which, sure, in a frictionless, spherical universe full of perfectly rational actors that exists only in a textbook, maybe that argument has some merit.

In the real world it means arguing that disfiguring people or giving them horrific terminal cancer should just be a line item on your ledger, next to rent and breakroom coffee.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Hey, my doc just said I was low on vitamin Mercury Hexachlorobenzene Polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB) 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDF) 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. I'm saved!

[–] Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I think you made a typo.

~~progress~~ profits

/s

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 3 points 11 months ago

These are mostly combustion byproducts btw. Mercury emissions come from coal fired powerplants, PCBs are an old and long discontinued type of nonflammable coolant, HCB also isn't even manufactured probably

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

This dovetails nicely with RFKs health initiatives.

Should really ~~kill~~ spike that autism rate.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 45 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Aren’t these the same people banning Fluoride and complaining about supposed Mercury in vaccines???

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Maybe, but what does that have to do with anything??? /s

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago

Hypocrisy is their super power. you kight vaguely annoy them if you point it out, but they'll never stop or recognize it.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Yep.

They want the good chemicals out, the bad ones in

I know that this way too oversimplified, chemistry is hard, but dihydrogen monoxide isn't a bad thing, as much as Republicans will think it is.

Republicans and their supporters are giant ignorant idiots with huge dunning-kruger issues

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Reading this as I'm sitting in a park, looking across the bay at the mainland and thinking about how visible and thick the pollution is today. Above me the sky is a beautiful and vibrant blue, lots of fluffy clouds. Then you look toward the horizon and there's a sickly pale, yellowish haze above the land.

America the beautiful, indeed...

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You guys are fucked. Wait you know that already. I really am sorry (atleast for everyone who voted NOT orange poison). I would allow every U.S. refugee.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not just Americans who are fucked, it's basically anything that breathes.

[–] lowleekun@ani.social 2 points 11 months ago

You are not wrong and i hate it.

[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

good thing we can breathe money

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

These scumbags should be forced to live downwind from these polluters...

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Inside the smoke stacks

[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemm.ee 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

ngl I saw that thumbnail and thought it was news about the pope again

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

You don’t have to worry about that until the 7th.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The Orange Pope.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is there some reason this wasn’t filibustered?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

According to a reply I got when I asked that question on another thread, this is being done under the Congressional Review Act, which isn't subject to supermajority rules.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

And specifically because it was only instituted 60 days before the change in Congress. If this had been implemented before the election they couldn't block it with a simple majority.

[–] TheMightyCat@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Haven't you heard? Breathable air is DEI now.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Can't be woke if the air lacks sufficient oxygen to support conciousness.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

I feel like secret service would get itself all in a tizzy, citing things like "terrorism" and "chemical warfare" if members of the senate and/or their staffers received care packages containing:

Alkylated lead compounds, Polycyclic organic matter (POM), Mercury, Hexachlorobenzene, Polychlorinated biphenyls(PCB), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDF), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Seems kinda hypocritical imho.

Several Republican lawmakers have been attempting to revoke the rule. Republican Sen. John Curtis of Utah introduced the resolution which passed Thursday. Curtis had argued that the rule disincentivized companies to deploy new technology to reduce pollution.

"The rule put forward under the former administration shut the door on progress," Curtis said in a statement after the resolution's passage. "It told companies that no matter how much they invest to reduce harmful emissions, they would still be punished with permanent red tape. That's not good science, it's not good governance, and it certainly isn't good for the environment. My resolution restores a common-sense incentive: if you clean up, you get credit for it."

Buuuuuuuuut, if you don't clean up, don't worry about it.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago

si-cough cough cough-gh

[–] yumpsuit@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It’s always a great time to make respirator masks like N95s a part of your life, even if you stopped or never started. The future will have even more fun reasons to own inexpensive P100 elastomerics with backup multi-gas cartridges too!

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Fucking DIOXIN?!

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago

Very bad even by already low American standards. Does anyone know what other countries regulations look like in relation to this? Does Canada have laws limiting any of these? European countries? I'm trying to find out, but info is sparse it seems.