this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
366 points (99.5% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

6668 readers
61 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 135 points 11 months ago (4 children)
[–] dulcetsunshine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 11 months ago

Perfect. Thank you.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 11 points 11 months ago

Just in time for spring cleaning. Thanks.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Can I delete my account if I never made an account in the first pace?

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 105 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I’m wondering which of these 2 options is true for the chief techbro who came up with this:

  1. They are genuinely clueless, and have never used ChatGPT for more than 5 minutes
  2. They know the limitations of LLMs well, but they want to ride the AI hype to inflate their company value (and maybe cut some costs by downsizing)
[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago

They believe in infinite growth. They think LLMs are going to get reliable fast. LLMs have probably played a direct role in convincing them of that

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yep they're paying lip service to the employees but this message is 100% to potential investors looking to bet on the AI wave.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 11 months ago

it being an email from their CEO is basically all the evidence needed, CEOs don't say anything that isn't somehow meant to increase profits.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For the first time ever, teaching as well as the best human tutors is within our reach.

No it fucking isn't. The video calls are awful and don't do anything to help you learn why what you said is wrong. Lilly just acts confused and ignores what you said. And in their normal explanations it just assumes why you didn't know something, gives an answer for what it guessed, and doesn't do anything else. The old explanations were much better than the new garbage they offer.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

That's pretty on point for the kind of stereotypical girl lily is supposed to be.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

Humans-last

[–] tauren@lemm.ee 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

AI could make Duolingo better because it doesn't teach a language in its current state. It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong and offer exercises. But instead of doing that, they simply replace employees to save money? What a garbage company. It's a shame their app is so popular. It gives people nothing but a false sense of learning.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong

FWIW that feature has existed in the premium version for about a year or so

[–] tauren@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I abandoned Duolingo 6 months ago. If that's true, they failed to advertise that to me. In any case, with modern llms you don't need Duolingo for that. You can ask them. You can copy-paste any article on a subject that interests you, and ask an llm to simplify it to your A1-A2 level. You can ask it to generate exercises, to explain things. Flashcards? Please, Anki is free.

[–] npcknapsack@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

When I got rid of Duo, it had removed the crowd sourced explanations and only had the super-premium support in select countries, so even if I wanted to subscribe to it, as a non-American, I couldn't.

Mind you, I didn't want the AI-based version because yeah. I could use Anki + ChatGPT for free.

[–] PDFuego@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I haven't used the app for a while, but I still have it installed. The delete account button doesn't work, and neither does the feedback button. Cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 30 points 11 months ago

Ever since their content is being created or at least sub crrated by AI the quality has gone down noticeable, ive seen so many incorrect sentences which is shit when trying to learn a language. And if i, as a beginner learner can figure out wrong sentences what the actual fuck is ai doing?

[–] piefood@feddit.online 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was using Khan Academy when they went to AI. Suddenly my answers were being marked as incorrect, even though they matched the "correct" answer presented. Or they were marked incorrect becuase I used pi, when it said I could answer in terms of pi.

I'm expecting the same to happen here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 11 months ago

Glad I finished my first Dutch unit just to get the basics and am deleting the app today. It feels like a real condemnation of the state of modern AI that I don't trust a large language model with languages.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I was thinking of removing duo before this. It's just glorified flash cards making you memorize words associations instead of getting into how thimgs work. I still haven't gotten the rules of how verb conjugation works in Italian. Just gonna read the books I got.

[–] genuineparts 17 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the heads up. Deleted my account and unistalled their app.

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm working on Spanish now with it and I have to admit it's significantly improved from the last time I used it a few years back. Fewer nonsense sentences to translate like "My bear loves your house", which was frustrating and felt so useless. There's way more listening and speaking modules, they are generally decent at speech to text, and the language pronunciation sounds more realistic with multiple very different voices.

However, I never know why I got a question wrong, and can't do anything to rectify that other than report that the AI made a mistake, which helps with their model training, but does absolutely squat for my learning. Even the more gamified exercises are just fancy tests, where you are expected to 'learn' by getting things wrong, seeing the correct answer and regurgitating it. The community forums and explanations are gone, and each module has maybe one or two example sentences that typically don't even cover the full range of content in the module.

My husband and I have a family plan, and he is a much more dedicated user than me, but I would never pay for duolingo on my own.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 21 points 11 months ago

I left after seeing a lot of useful community suggestions completely ignored for a long time. A few months later they finally closed the community making clear they won't hear anyone. I won't bother trying to get anything from them.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I have found that Language Transfer is a far superior way to learn languages (including Spanish), and it's free (although I make a monthly donation)!

It is available as YouTube videos, SoundCloud MP3s, or on a very simple but effective app.

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

https://www.languagetransfer.org/

I think you mean this, your link is broken. I love them too and recommend them all the time (it's mostly a one guy effort actually, it's super impressive).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

Just calling it out: The nonsense/goofy sentences were used because it was found by studies to be more effective for learning/recall.

That wasn't a flaw, just a poorly/not at all broadcasted feature.

[–] Waldelfe@feddit.org 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can't be good for the quality. I already get a lot of errors in my native language: the correct translation to my native language is not accepted and the "correct translation according to Duolingo" is grammatically wrong. So I keep getting errors for not using wrong grammar in my own mother language. This is going to keep getting so much worse and I have to wonder, if I'm even learning the correct grammar in the foreign language.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

yeah, it's pretty common for AI answers to feel very accurate and useful on topics the user doesn't know much about, but highly error-prone and unreliable on topics the user is an expert in. ... ... ...

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure it's wrong about my area of expertise, but I'm sure it's right about everyone else's!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 15 points 11 months ago

Duolingo has been using AI for a bit at least for their content, and it sucks

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 11 months ago

Good luck with that, I'll watch the outcome with great interest.

[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

the last sentence is crazy foreshadowing

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Anyone had any luck getting refunded?

[–] letme_meowmeow@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

I would rather talk with read dude to learn English than AI

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are there any viable non-AI alternatives to Duolingo?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›