Mildly Interesting

I’m surprised that what seems to me to be the most obvious hypothesis isn’t covered. Until very recently, historically speaking, written and spoken language have been very clearly separated forms of language use.

With the advent of the internet, instant messaging, social media etc, the distinction has been gradually blurring in the sense that written language is being used more and more frequently for what would previously have been considered ‘spoken uses’.

We know spoken language mostly consists of shorter fragmented phrases compared to the longer complete sentences of the written word. It should not be surprising that as writing is increasingly used for ‘written speech’, regular writing will be influenced to move in the direction of the shorter phrasing of spoken language while otherwise maintaining the syntax and grammar rules of written language forms.

I’d like to see them take variance (i.e., range of different sentence lengths) into account—my impression is that more-modern writing has a more dynamic mix of long and short sentences, which could skew the stats in an unintuitive way.

Consider two paragraphs that both have a total of 300 words:

• Paragraph A has three 100-word sentences.

• Paragraph B has two 140-word sentences and four 5-word sentences.

Paragraph B has half the average sentence length of paragraph A, but over 90% of the text of B is comprised of sentences that are significantly longer than any of the sentences of A.

My theory: authors got smarter and learned to properly partition their words into readable sentences, without mindlessly clausing on and on and on.

cz its hrd 2 type.

I rlly thought ts was abt prison sentences

Laconicism.

As William Shakespeare once said: “brevity”