this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
53 points (94.9% liked)

UK Politics

4160 readers
21 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has published interim guidance following last week's Supreme Court decision. It instructs organisations that manage public spaces and workplaces to create segregated mixed-sex bathrooms, washing and changing facilities for Trans+ people to use.

It does this on the basis that same-sex spaces can only be used by people that align with the Supreme Court's definition of 'biological sex', while also saying that Trans+ perceived to be of the wrong gender can't use bathrooms that match their biological sex.

If taken beyond interim guidance and made statutory, it would be the biggest human rights disaster since racial segregation and apartheid.

The guidance covers workplaces, schools, and services open to the public, such as hospitals, shops and restaurants.

It stipulates that, where possible, mixed-sex toilets, washing and changing facilities should now be provided. In an interim period, it sets out where this is not possible, trans people should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FarceOfWill 11 points 3 months ago

So should we all be making sure the mixed sex toilets are the most used until they need more mixed than single to cope?

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Feel bad for that flying squid guy, he moved him and his daughter out there for better trans rights and now it's getting as bad as US

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think about him from time to time. I thought it was because his daughter is a lesbian, though? Unless I'm mistaken. Didn't really stalk the guy.

[–] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Squid's been AWOL for over a month now. Hope that he's OK.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

Same, and his daughter

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We should not forget the original aim of the ruling which is genocide. That last part about introducing mixed-sex toilets in thanks to public protests. They work. Keep up with public protests until the ruling is reversed.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What ethnic group is being systematically murdered here?

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not an ethnic group but transgender people are the targets of genocide. It doesn't start with systematic killings. It ends there, and denying them medical treatment is already systemic killing, only indirect.

Edit: I'm not able to reply to this person's reply for some reason (did they block me?) so I instead paste it below:

We are currently on stages 3, 4 and 6 of genocide. The point is to identify them before they get to stage 9.

https://hmd.org.uk/learn-about-the-holocaust-and-genocides/what-is-genocide/the-ten-stages-of-genocide/

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Genocide refers to the systemic forced killing or forced sterilisation of an ethnic group.

Transgender people in the United Kingdom are entitled to the same medical treatment as everybody else. They have a right to life and a right to reproduce and are not forcibly sterilised.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Genocide refers to the systemic forced killing or forced sterilisation of an ethnic group.

Genocide doesn't have to be killings or sterilisation. It can be any action with the intention of destroying a group, in whole or in part.

It also doesn't only apply to ethnic groups.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you acknowledge you were wrong then? It's not strictly about killing or sterilisation, not is it strictly down to ethnic groups.

Thank you for proving me right 👍

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, we're both wrong here at best. It doesn't include sexual orientation or gender identity

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I never said whether it did or didn't. I only said your definition is wrong.

Don't try to take some quasi-victory out of this.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

thanks for proving me right 👍

knobhead.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You: genocide is just when you kill or sterilise ethnic groups

Me: that's not the definition of genocide, it's more broad than that.

You: um ackshully it turns out the definition of genocide isn't strictly ethnic groups, nor is it only killing or sterilisation

You literally proved me right. No harm in admitting that I was right and you were wrong. There's no need to get upset about it and sling insults around.

You are forgiven for being wrong. It's no big deal.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dunno why there'll be a need to segregate single units. I think all bathrooms should be single units.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Single use are more expensive, but absolutely the only right way to make a bathroom. We all deserve to shit in peace!

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Exactly. I hate urinals. Never used them except times of desperation. Too exposed.

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

I think we should just get rid of all public toilets. Everyone doing their business out in the open obviates all questions of segregation and means there will be witnesses if anyone gets out of hand. We could still have dedicated areas for it, perhaps in places like Kensington & Chelsea.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If taken beyond interim guidance and made statutory, it would be the biggest human rights disaster since racial segregation and apartheid.

What?

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

When black people couldn't use the same bathrooms as white folk. Here, Trans women including those post op for 20 - 30 years are not allowed to use the women's bathroom and have to use the men's. Likewise, a trans man, born woman, that has been a man for decades has to use the women's bathroom.

Wasn't sure it needed to be spelt out, but needs to be to understand how ridiculous all this is (because of a court case in Scotland about women's representation on boards). Shocking how many rights got trashed with that and how many transhobic politicians got excited.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think it's like comparing apples and oranges.

Trans women including those post op for 20 - 30 years are not allowed to use the women's bathroom and have to use the men's.

According to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, you have to be born as a woman in order to be a woman.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A court I'd not heard about until now, for a case funded by a transphobe who writes shitty wizard books.

To go further, I think the judgement is wrong and probably has their own biases shining through.

I think it is hard to see injustice if you do not want to see it.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's your opinion in which I respect, but comparing such a thing to apartheid is a bit of a stretch, and I'd strongly recommend against such a thing.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trans people are slowly having their rights eroded and you’re arguing about the definition of genocide, from that instance.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They have the same rights as everybody else

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you don’t see this as taking away of trans rights and a reduction of social acceptance, you’re part of the problem.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is why I can't take stuff like this seriously these days

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

According to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, you have to be born as a woman in order to be a woman.

This isn't accurate, the SC ruled that the only consistent definition of woman for the purposes of the 2010 Equalities Act is a 'biological woman'*. A trans woman with a GRC is still legally a woman, she's just not afforded the protections graned to women in the Equalities Act. (This is a crock of shit, but I'll spare you that rant)

* You might wonder how the SC actually defines 'biological woman' and it has nothing to actually do with biology, it's just if you originally had woman marked down on you birth certificate.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Ty for the correction!