this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
651 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16131 readers
573 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] The_v@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey now for every 5,000 "No's" there's the coveted 1 "Maybe but more data is required".

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago

Maybe if you're really lucky, one day you can get a "Yes, but..... also no."

This is how the science do

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

RIP in pieces, every supersymmetry based theory :(

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is there a new observation regarding supersymmetry?

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Couldn't tell ya. Iirc SUSY based theories were pretty much all killed by data by the time the LHC reached 12TeV collisions, and I've been in a different field since then

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

data be bitching like this unless you work for a private company in which case you are told to make data the company's bitch

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Lol I need this shirt.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

A theory is valid only when no proof to the contrary is known, after which the theory must be adjusted to accommodate the new findings, or discarded.

[–] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, systemic biases definitely don't exist in research because researchers are perfectly indiscriminate human beings and poor research has never led to swaths of the population being hurt or neglected. /s

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago