this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
101 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

3412 readers
429 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
fxomt@piefed.social
101
South Korea says DeepSeek transferred user data to China and the U.S. without consent (www.cnbc.com)
submitted 3 months ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is this news?

Literally this is a set up for data gathering and idiots keep using these hosted LLM products without care.

If you ain't running it yourself with a proper set up, your shit is being data mined

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

I just wish everyone understood that these companies are not making money out of the model's output, but rather from the user's inputs.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the app/website.

However, isn't DeepSeek also Open Source software? I doubt that also sends data to China.

Ed Zitron says it works just as well/bad as silicon valley's toys but needs only a fraction of the resources, and the tech bros have their knickers in a twist.

So I'm a bit skeptical when american corporate media bashes deepseek.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

deleted by creator

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure open AI will just "borrow" their code and a new release will magically be just as efficient

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Exactly.

But Ed said you could also use your own models, train it yourself.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you don't want your locally hosted deep seek to send days to China, just setup a firewall and you're done

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

deleted by creator

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know, I'm just saying that if the software (not the dataset) calls home, you can either modify the software, which is hard to do right, or you just easily block it with a firewall

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

[–] KuroiKaze@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

In other news: Water Wet

[–] Kobo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

... and the whole world is SHOCKED!

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

& the USA ? Wow