this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
1028 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

18511 readers
2487 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Just the other day I was telling my son that instead of Ant Man, it should've been Mant.

[–] duke_valentino@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] odium@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago

M'ant tips fedora

[–] PowerGloveSoBad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It's actually spelled Maunt

[–] CurlyChopz@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Surely it would be Small Ant or Smant

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We are all men. He is a "rat"-man, I am a "hu"-man.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 23 points 2 years ago

to him, he is a hu-rat, and you are a man-rat.

[–] MothBookkeeper@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So what does he want to be called? Just a rat? But - there are actual rats, which are already called rats. Unless those don't exist in this universe, "ratman" seems like a pretty reasonable term. He has both rat and humanoid features.

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Serious answer? He'd be called a Rat-Man in the language of humans, and an original word in his own language

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah. Him calling the man "man-rat" makes no sense though. For it to make sense, there would have to be something even more human and more distant from rats, so that he could be viewed as half rat.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The rat...person would call themselves a word in their language that would translate to man language as "hu-rat". the man would thus be a man-rat.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

But the human calls the rat-person a ratman because they seem to be something between a human and a rat. The human would call a regular rat a rat. Why would the rat-person call the human a man-rat, if the human is a regular human? Who would he call man then?

[–] Omgarm@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Maybe in that world there are tiny humans that crawl in their walls and steal their food.

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah but they're called pixies/fairies/gnomes/whatever

What do they bait their man-traps with - scratch lotto tickets?

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a false equivalency on the Ratman's part. There exist rats. There exist men. He's a cross somewhere between, where the man is just a man. I mean, provided there isn't some kind of miniature, unintelligent human analog in this world.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

There are abd they eat the cheese made the ratmen.

[–] kilorat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago
[–] egonallanon@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Man-thing shuts up-up and hands over the warpstone now, yes-yes.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Darkblue@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The daemon is not his foot (badly drawn, so it looks like that?). They are "buddies" and travel together.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[–] Thoth19@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And ofc humans are called "man man". That's what homo sapien roughly translates to.