this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
316 points (98.2% liked)

News

35749 readers
2278 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 167 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Niccol travels regularly from his home in Newport Beach, California, to Starbucks' headquarters in Seattle, Washington, via private jet. Each 2,000-mile round-trip commute releases nearly nine tons of carbon dioxide.

The National Center for Public Policy Research's Free Enterprise Project's director Stefan Padfield pointed out the discrepancy of policy and practice during his presentation of Proposal 8 requesting an annual report on emissions congruency. He noted that each round trip made by Niccol "is roughly the annual energy-consumption footprint of the typical American household."

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 130 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It’s not even just super rich. I used to work for a company that did about 200m in sales and the boss was taking a private jet at lease once a week. Then he laid off 20% of his company in 2024 instead of flying first class.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Name and shame!

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago

They’ll risk increased chance of crashing and lose hundreds of productive employees than rub elbows with hoi polloi.

Makes you think.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

And yet, it's the Average Joe's and Jane's fault for not buying EVs.

[–] besselj@lemmy.ca 99 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Haven't bought stuff from sbux in the last few months because of their union busting and DEI rollbacks. Seems like it was the right choice.

[–] Crewman@sopuli.xyz 81 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I don't buy from them because their coffee is bad.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think they sell coffee, just like subway doesn't sell 12 inch sandwiches.

They sell coffee flavored sugar water.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Venti (20 oz) Peppermint White Chocolate Mocha: 580 calories

Big mac: 590 calories

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The big Mac is probably better for your body. I mean less bad. Don't wanna really say "healthier" but I'm sure you get my meaning.

I Googled it and the bullshit Ai summary is REALLY going to bat for starfucks. First it compared a grande mocha to a whole big Mac combo (480 vs 1100 cal) , the when I specified "venti" and "sandwich" it decided to make the mocha a nonfat milk with no whip which brought it down to 400.

Regardless, 72g of sugar in that friggin thing.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I relied too heavily on chatgpt search.

12oz Peppermint White Chocolate Mocha is 360cal so 20oz is 600cal.

It got the 590cal big mac correct

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I wanted to compare the nutrition info directly but it's a hassle on mobile so I had to try to sucker the Google ai into doing it. It didn't work.

Pretty sure the mocha is on par with or worse than the big Mac in every way except sodium.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My days of not purchasing anything from Starbucks are definitely coming to a middle

[–] StickyDango@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!

[–] Laser@feddit.org 16 points 10 months ago

"You don't buy from Starbucks because of social issues.

I don't buy from Starbucks because their coffee is bad.

We are not the same."

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Petes is soooo much better.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I've never seen a Pete's coffee shop, I thought it was just a supermarket brand.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They have physical locations too. I'm on the east coast so they're not as popular here. Major city though.

Used to have like 6 locations but they're down to 2 now that I know of in my state.

You can also just aim for local shops instead of chains.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It’s a Bay Area company. They aren’t all over the U.S. According to a map on their website there are 286. Approximately 47.5% are located in the Bay Area.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s a Bat Area company

Gotham?

... are located in the Bay Area

Ohh... Way less cool

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Look Starbucks owes Peet’s everything. That company started off buying from Peet’s.

[–] PixelTron@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Bad is an understatement! I compare it to Fosters beer, it’s piss water. Had it twice in my life, never again…

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You should try Dunkin Donuts coffee. That's really bad coffee. Starbucks isn't that bad, it's just roasted so bad to make it consistent. Can't tell the difference when it's burned to shit, and most people order what are basically milkshakes with a bit of coffee in them anyway.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 10 months ago

Boyd's is the worst coffee. Not sure they have coffee shops anymore. Starbucks is always 'burnt' tasting.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Being able to feel pious about it is a nice bonus, though, lol

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 2 points 10 months ago

Well they have been caught multiple times buying from slave labor farms in Brazil, buying from a farm with child labor in Guatemala and possibly contributing to the decline of commodity prices in 2019 (which was under a $1).

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 89 points 10 months ago (2 children)

His commute was pointed out before his first day on the job. They don't care.

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Mario might 😬

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Yep. I remember the news article calling him out for not wanting to move and taking a private jet to work instead.

No repercussions at all. People are shocked when he actually did the things he said??

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I already never go there, but now I can have a chip on my shoulder about it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll join you under the smug cloud.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
  1. Boycott and talk to others around you as to why you are boycotting.

  2. Create fake amazing resumes, apply for high-level jobs at Starbucks, Amazon, etc.

  3. Waste their time with interviews, then bail out. Tell them you changed your mind because they have a toxic reputation.

  4. If you already work for one of these corporations, sabotage their operations. There's manuals out there on how to conduct sabotage, but it can be as simple as relaying the wrong day or time for meetings to waste everyone's time, or finding things that are not exactly according to policy and making a big deal about the importance of following policy to the letter, etc.

[–] truxnell 22 points 10 months ago

I have a plan at $job that will reduce our CO2 emissions a year by ~330 tonnes.

Almost makes you wonder why bother sometimes

[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

I like my coffee but I don't find it hard to avoid Starbucks. Plus they're not even nice places to go. They've been enshitified big time.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The National Center for Public Policy Research's Free Enterprise Project's director Stefan Padfield pointed out the discrepancy of policy and practice during his presentation of Proposal 8 requesting an annual report on emissions congruency. Padfield suggested, "Perhaps the problem is not the related business practices, but rather the ill-conceived decision to wrap the company in unrealistic climate goals."

The National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), founded in 1982, is a self-described conservative think tank in the United States. -Wikipedia

Group calls out discrepancy between a businesses actions and their stated goals. Then goes on to say that maybe the goals were too unrealistic. Hmm, I manage to make it to my job everyday without using a private jet.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I get offered a job in an office I’m gonna demand a private jet, too.

“What do you mean ICs don’t get private jets?!”

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 3 points 10 months ago

Those who do the actual work, should get the actual plane!

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

This is old news, no idea how this asshole still has a job.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

If only they'd adopt work from home instead of fighting against it 🙃