this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
53 points (63.9% liked)

Games

20699 readers
131 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 82 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] misk@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW THAT NINTENDO IS WORSE THAN IF POL POT AND MING THE MERCILESS STARTED A KISS TRIBUTE BAND WITH POL POT PLAYING THE SAXOPHONE.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

WOULDN'T THAT KIND OF DEPEND ON WHAT MING THE MERCILESS WAS PLAYING? YOU GOTTA GET SOME STRINGS IN THERE TO BE A PROPER KISS TRIBUTE BAND, SO IF HE WHIPPED OUT AN ELECTRIC MANDOLIN OR SOMETHING, I MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN LISTENING TO WHAT THEY COME UP WITH. I'D EVEN TAKE A BANJO.

I'M NOT SUPPORTING EITHER PERSON (FAKE OR REAL) IN ANY WAY, JUST BEING HONEST.

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

WHY IS YOUR USERNAME YELLING?!

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wasn’t hugged enough as a child

[–] ech@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I fucking hate all caps titles.

[–] doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I disabled my caps lock button, and my life got so much better.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wasn't going to, it's such a dumb purchase unless you have money lying around.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Completely agree. They burnt all their goodwill in the past few years. I have no interest in the company and the products.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

That's exactly it. They burned all their goodwill seriously, and continue to do so.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why? The first Switch is pretty fantastic for my use case, which is casual gaming w/ my kids, their friends, and my nephews/nieces.

I also have a Steam Deck and most of my gaming money goes to PC games. But I do like the Zelda series, so I'll buy a handful of games now and then for the Switch (usually as gifts to my kids for X-mas or whatever to kill two birds w/ one stone).

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mainly the price of games and the other price gouging tactics they’re trying out

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, if it's not a good value for you, then don't buy it. Console games have never been cheap, and consoles have generally been affordable (not cheap).

IMO, the prices aren't outlandish when you take inflation into account. Here's an article that goes over it:

  • OG NES - $180 in 1985, ~$480 today
  • SNES - $200 in 1991, ~$415 today
  • N64, Game Cube, Wii - ~$330, give or take
  • Switch - ~$440

And this page lists game prices:

  • NES - $146
  • N64 - $120
  • GameCube - ~$90
  • Wii - $80
  • Switch - $77

So generally a downward trend. The Switch 2's expected prices are a bit of a correction to $80-90, but still pretty much in line with recent consoles.

Here's the image for reference:

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, I get it. You really don’t need to post an entire breakdown when I can read it on any gaming site. These never seem to take into account that manufacturing games has become much cheaper or that the majority of games are sold digitally which have negligible costs compared to physical. Maybe I’m wrong about that but at the end of the day we are still getting used to $70 when it comes to modern consoles—so Nintendo thinking their games are worth more than that on top of being a generation behind? It’s a shitty look, honestly, especially combined with the other crap that’s come out about pricing since the reveal

manufacturing games has become much cheaper

Sure, the physical distribution is cheaper, but the development is way more expensive. That's largely offset by more sales, hence the gradually reducing real price of games.

Yeah, it's never fun seeing prices go up, but they tend to stay pretty flat during a console generation. So at the start, they're making more than at the end, when inflation has chipped away at the value they're getting per sale.

I'm not saying it's "good" or anything, I also prefer cheaper games, just that it's understandable when looking at pricing history compared to inflation.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

You might be right, but basically everyone is expecting there to be significant features of MKW which are as yet unannounced but will be featured in the upcoming Nintendo direct which is focused on that game specifically.

There is certainly an argument to be made about DLC cost being included upfront (and Zelda was already $90 on Switch 1 including the DLC) to avoid splitting up the player base for a game with an online focus. That might not be what they're doing, but my point is there are things they could do to justify the price increase for many players.

They also might just do nothing more than what's already been announced, but I doubt it because why then would they do another reveal later?

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 3 points 3 months ago

Shitty hardware, stick drift that they port to the new console, insane prices, they shoce dlc's into kuds faces until they make their parents buy it...

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Didn't plan to buy one, before the S2 was announced.

The number of anti consumer actions they take is amazing. They still hate YouTube. Instead of making their games not suck, they sue anyone who dares to try. They have a handful of console exclusive that even interest me, everything else I'll get in Steam and it'll play better, have cloud save, and a refund policy.

I bought a NES in the 80s because it was the most amazing, magical thing. Now I'm at the point of 'Fuck Nintendo, let it fall'

[–] digitalnuisance 21 points 3 months ago

Clicks the upload button

"I did it. Nintendo is surely finished. This will definitely work."

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago

I haven't decided yet, because it's not available yet. Once it's available, I'll check reviews and whatnot to decide whether to purchase it. Maybe I will, maybe I won't, it depends on a bunch of factors.

Yeah, Nintendo sucks right in the legal department. But whether I buy their products has less to do with their legal department and more to do with the quality of the product.

[–] The_Helmet_Stays_On@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Done. Can’t afford one anyways.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

can afford, absolutely no buy

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Stop posting this garbage to every community

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I won't. And not even due to the bad PR.

I never bought a Switch. Thought about it, but never got around to it. I guess I'm just not the target audience.

Though now in thinking about it, I bet I can pick up a good condition used Switch on the cheap once this comes out. Maybe I'll get the first gen Switch after all!

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I bought a Switch back in the day. Beat BotW and that was fun. Barely touched it since.

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, the price point would have to be low enough to be worth it for the few console specific titles that'd interest me.

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

First gen’s are hard to find cheap due to how easily exploited they are.

[–] JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

By first gen I meant not a switch 2. I'm not too particular about which version or revision.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And that's the only reason I'm even vaguely considering picking up a Switch 2 around launch.

That said, even with a gen 1 Switch, booting into the CFW is just enough of a pain that I don't do it often. Gotta grab the shim for the rail, plug it into something that can deliver the payload... ugh.

I miss the days of Wii and PSP homebrew. No online shit to get banned from, no special booting techniques. 3DS cfw came pretty close in terms of ease of use.

That said, being able to pirate games directly from the 3DS and Switch was a big step up from having to transfer files over to the memory card (PSP) or effectively needing a dedicated external HDD/partition (Wii). Even if it was slow as hell and couldn't use my full internet speed.

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

Don’t forget Vita. Thing was king of being opened up in my opinion.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

OK. Never bought anything from Nintendo, so that's not a great sacrifice.

[–] pneumatron@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They didn't even fix the annoying joystick issues.

[–] Noerknhar@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How do you know? You played on a Switch 2?

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How do you not know they haven't updated to use hall effect joycons? You not read anything at all about this until just now?

[–] Noerknhar@feddit.org 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They can fix the issue and not use hall effect.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They knew it from the beginning and never adressed it. Why would they, nintenodo babies are just gonna buy new controllers

[–] Noerknhar@feddit.org 1 points 3 months ago

So everyone who buys a Nintendo is a baby now? Wow, how very mature.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago

Yes. I'm sure they can. I don't think that they have, or will. See: the recall formula scene from "Fight Club" for reference.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I'm getting one on launch. Love my OG switch and got many cherished hours of gaming out of it.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Me, not being a little baby man, am going to buy one at some point because I want to play the Zeldas and the Marios and no one is gonna keep me from enjoying those games when they come out—and I’m still gonna emulate on my Retroid ‘cause fuck Big Gaming.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fuck big gaming but you'll still hand them money and emulate?

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Or, get this - if you want a switch 2, buy a switch 2 if you can afford it.

[–] multiplemigs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

lol, ok. /s

[–] Noerknhar@feddit.org 0 points 3 months ago

Too late, I already pre-ordered. I'll make sure to let you know what a shit time I'll have with it. I promise.