this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
54 points (100.0% liked)

News

51 readers
1 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 2 years ago
 

A study, out of the University of Waterloo in partnership with Stand.earth, analyzed the public equity portfolios of eight major U.S. public pension funds to determine the effect divesting from their energy holdings would have had. In total, researchers estimate that the pension funds would have seen a return on their investments that was 13% higher on average.

Another analysis of the same eight U.S. public pension funds included in the report found that the carbon footprint that would have been reduced had they divested 10 years ago is equivalent to the emissions for powering 35 million homes per year.

all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hello_there@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Related: head of CalPERS talks about this and throws out some figure of it costing hundreds of millions to divest. Either they're looking at different numbers or someone is being disingenuous. https://www.kqed.org/forum/2010101893529/climate-fix-can-forcing-pension-funds-to-divest-from-fossil-fuels-help-california-reduce-carbon-emissions

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Chances are what that means is they have unrealized losses- and closing the position would make them “real” loses.

Carrying bags buried in swaps is a great way to look more profitable than you are.

[–] Xeelee@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

All it takes is a willingness to look at the world rationally and let go of preconceived notions, yet this see,s to be incredibly hard.