this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
294 points (99.0% liked)

Transgender

899 readers
102 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 154 points 4 months ago (5 children)

And I'm one of them. There's absolutely no way I would or even could ever date some loathsome piece of shit who opposes trans rights, supports Trump, defends the Capitol attack, opposes DEI, wants abortion banned or wants gender roles legislated.

If anything, I'm disappointed that there aren't more of us.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right?

I can't imagine the kind of person that cares so little.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I can. I think they are my family. I just don't hear their voices ever. Nevermind Trump support for a second, most of them do not support him. But, all I ever get is silence. I open my mouth, finally there's pushback. Not necessarily that they are bigots, but they are more interested in order than justice, is my take. I can't figure it out otherwise. Not without help.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season."

Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

-Martin Luther King Jr

[–] knightly@pawb.social 12 points 4 months ago

I'm just neurologically incapable of putting myself in their heads. I get that such moderates exist and always constitute a majority in the population, but I can't understand them.

Order without justice is tyranny. If there is no justice, then the order is illegitimate by definition. Yet so many keep acting as if our government is legitimate despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary.

And I can't even blame most of the opposition to reform because the propaganda and surveillance in this country is so thick it makes 1984 seem old-fashioned in comparison.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah I mean how could you date, much less marry someone whose values are so out of whack with yours??

Glad I never had that problem. It's like, just date cool people??

[–] zib@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Some people are good at hiding their crazy. Luckily, MAGA types are generally pretty loud about their bigotry and never shut the hell up, so it's easier to weed them out.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Yeah I mean how could you date, much less marry someone whose values are so out of whack with yours??

Because they lie.

A lot of straight conservative men know that many women do not want to date conservative men. They will not present themselves as conservative men, and instead will list themselves perhaps as “moderates” or “centrists” or otherwise “hide their power level.” This is true for conservative gay men as well, to a lesser extent.

People can be very good at hiding who they really are until the night after you get married. It’s terrifying.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago

Seriously, being a bigot is a deal breaker.

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I find it hard to even work with those types of ppl, let alone date one.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I have two brothers who are variations on the theme.

I'm the oldest and middle brother is a longtime conspiracy theorist who's on the anti-vaxx, deep state fringe (and at least pleasantly is notably not a bigot) and youngest is an IT guy and a stock,,-standard tech "libertarian" who rages about wokeism and free speech and idolizes Musk and is about every kind of bigot imaginable.

So I spend holidays mostly hiding in the study, surfing the web and trying to ignore the bits of mansplained propaganda wafting down the hall...

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's rough, sorry you have that problem. I have a similar thing with my mom and her trump loving b/f. The holidays usually last about 1 hour before I leave.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

yUgh. That sounds even worse. You have my sympathy.

It's a weird thing about this era. In the past, I would've tried to argue with them about their views, but at this point, it's effectively impossible, since we don't even share a reality. They live in a world in which, for instance, Kamala Harris is a DEI hire who got appointed as the candidate by Biden, who' in turn is still working for the Obamas, and she lost because she's a socialist.

Where do you even start with something like that?

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks, I have stopped even trying to make sense of their world. I just get up, say my good-bye to the rest of the family, and leave. It's kinda all you can do, they will try to pull you down to their level and then beat you with experience. Your situation is bonkers for sure.

[–] AllukaTheCutie7725@lemmy.blahaj.zone 66 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It makes sense, how can one feel safe around a person who hates and sees other human beings as less than human? It's almost impossible to feel safe around a person like that.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

honestly I can't tell whether a plurality of men think women are humans, let alone trans women ...

EDIT:

Lesbian, gay and bisexual women overwhelmingly identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party over the GOP (83% vs. 12%). Similarly, the Democratic Party enjoys a wide advantage among gay and bisexual men (83% vs. 17%).

Straight men are more likely to associate with the Republican Party than straight women (55% vs. 47%).

(source)

Men generally, but straight (and married esp.) men, seem to be "the problem".

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or, "the problem" is an uneducated electorate: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/government/politics-elections/2024/11/08/men-and-white-people-vote-differently-based-education

Whether this is due to "book smarts" or just a statement that going to college means you meet different people and generally expands your worldview, it seems to make a difference (men still more problematic than women, but less so when educated!).

[–] TeraByteMarx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
  • Supporting the democrats does not make you a safe person for some people, especially class conscious minorities and vulnerable people who were on the kill list long before Trump
  • Capitalism and patriarchy are the problem not men.
  • Blaming men as if they're a monolithic effectively ignores the spectrum of gender that exists and further alienates people who haven't had the chance to meet their own selves.
  • Blaming men has become a terf dog whistle
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago

pretty much agree with all of that 👍

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Opposition to any cohort's rights is a pretty clearcut indicator of very poor character.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I went on a first date with someone extremely attractive. Put "moderate" on her profile, didn't seem too bad. With no prompting from me whatsoever she brings up trans people and asks what I think. I say something along the lines of well I get it because as a guy if someone said I was biologically a girl I'd still be a guy inside. She said she wants kids and if the kids are trans she'd beat it out of them.

I mean she was hot enough that I had the thought that maybe I could change her. But I had to say no to a second date because there's no way I could date someone who one date in is already negotiating how she's going to beat my future kids for being themselves.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

I hope you told her why?

[–] amberfoxtail@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

parents beating kids is a major red flag. means that they have some pretty unsavory beliefs like believing children are property in addition to being okay with violence. also means they don't have appropriate conflict resolution and communication skills.

you dodged a bullet, they are some of the worst people humanity has to offer, hands down. coming from someone who had one of those parents. my sibling was beaten for questioning their sexuality.

[–] cubism_pitta@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

and...... Water is wet...

Do you think people who supported Civil rights in the 60s and 70s were off marrying people who opposed civil rights?

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Cross politics marriages were more common in the past.

A lot of women married to get away from their parents and became homemakers. If husband was conservative but not abusive you might keep quiet about what you do in the voting booth for the sake of peace peace at home.

Liberal men might not ask about their fiances politics. If she is hot and willing a lot of young men.

I'm not saying it was ever healthy, but it was more common.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

Why would I ever want to be around someone who hates simply for the sake of hating?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Well duh, no bigots or fascists. Huge red flag about their whole personality.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because people who oppose trans rights (or the rights of anyone for that matter) are fundamentally going to be pricks. This statistic is not solely about trans rights. Smart people with any sense of self preservation just don't want to date bigots and assholes.

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Some people aren't malicious but just really dumb and careless and get their politics from passive cultural osmosis. Sometimes they even respond well to reeducation efforts

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Thank God I'm married, not touching a bigot with 100 million meter pole.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

yeah, that's much to unwieldy to get a good swing in. 3 feet is about perfect for me, and I can pretend it's a cane for plausible deniability.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

...did they expect people who care about human rights to be interested in romantic connections with Nazis?

looks at results

Oh. What the fuck? Why are those numbers so low?

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Don't bang bigots. Simple as.

[–] KingOogaBooga@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

People are people. Treat them with decency and respect. ALL people. Not sure why that has to be considered a political view. I thought it was just being a good person.

[–] known_unknown@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

To police something so personal as gender expression is anti-American. Obviously if you care so much about people's private lives as to make it a part of your personality, you would have to be a huge piece of shit.

I rather think that's why they're made the outgroup du jour, people were too accepting of and familiar with LBG people, so they said let's narrow WAAAAAAY down to the Trans people and divide and conquer the marginalized groups

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, I could not be with a hater, that is an immediate no go.

I would not be friends even with someone who could not learn. Ignorance that is teachable is manageable as a friend, but not someone who has decided to be wrong.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

Huh, who would have guessed?

I’m not interested in dating someone who doesn’t think self determination is a fundamental human right.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

"About half of people would be unwilling to engage in relationships with people they don't share the same viewpoint on relationships as they do." This and more breaking news at 11.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not entirely comfortable around all trans people, some of them are pricks (as they were before transitioning).

I'm sure as fuck not comfortable around people who would not want equal rights for every minority, migrant, or consensual people(s) doing consented activities. Everyone deserves the rights that we agreed to have as a culture, even the pricks, I won't stand with anyone who has theirs and tries to take away others.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Judge people for what they do, not what they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›