this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
-10 points (39.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

36873 readers
314 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A person can be killed instantly through many different means.

As we know it, to be killed painlessly, is to be killed instantly.

If you instantly destroy a person's entire brain then they died without pain.

Yet the most effective ways of instantly destroying someone's entire brain are considered inhumane.

If instantly killing someone by smashing their head with a massive rock, or shooting them in the brain stem is inhumane, then there is no humane way to kill someone at all.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daddyjones@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

As we know it, to be killed painlessly, is to be killed instantly

This is not necessarily true. There are ways to fall asleep and never wake up. Not instant, but painless.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why did you think killing someone (murder) could ever be humane in the first place?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because the death penalty exists.

Because people are currently sentenced to execution even in the United States.

To those humans who are sentenced to death, why not choose a method that is instantaneous death, rather than something that can potentially fail.

I'd rather die instantly from a rock or a 12 gauge shell to the head than be injected or electrocuted.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Here is a tip: The world is not the USA...

If you are complaining about something that happens in the USA, say so.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The key metric for 'human' actions is to avoid needless suffering. Livestock processed humanly is not panicked, not given a slow painful death, it should be quick, clean, and without pain.

Living conditions are human if they don't create needless suffering, i.e. animals living in a open farm are human, animals living their lives in changes is inhumane.

I think the golden rule applies, treat others how you would like to be treated, is basically being humane.

I think the golden rule applies, treat others how you would like to be treated, is basically being humane.

What if you are a masochist?

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago

Well you certainly chose an appropriate username.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean, there is no humane way to kill someone.

But on the USA death penalty issue, yes, generally choices about how it is carried out, are made with the spectators in mind, and the process itself is made more torturous in order to make it look better. (John Oliver has some great information in his death penalty video)

[–] Oszilloraptor@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

And (afaik) with the executors mental health in mind as well.

e.g. if you just crush a head with a stone you will know you did it.

If two others and you have to push a button you can tell yourself that it's more probable you didn't kill somebody than that you did.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What about when it's their choice, like euthanasia?

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Careful, you might to get crucified for ths opinion.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

That would be inhumane

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Inert gas asphyxiation is considered as painless.

Accordingly, the human subject detects little abnormal sensation as the oxygen level falls. This leads to asphyxiation (death from lack of oxygen) without the painful and traumatic feeling of suffocation (the hypercapnic alarm response, which in humans arises mostly from carbon dioxide levels rising), or the side effects of poisoning.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I posted it there as well but people tend to be very touchy about human death regardless of circumstances.

I for one don't care what condition my body is in after I die as long as physically I didn't feel anything.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That makes me think of the Klingons from Star Trek "It is only an empty shell; do with it as you will."