this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
266 points (99.3% liked)

HistoryPorn

7294 readers
16 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Record scratch sound effect"

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Yep, that's me. I bet you're wondering how I got here.

[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

His face looks so disgusted by this.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

English face:

"I'm supposed to convince people this is a good idea?"

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Gee, I wonder why this technology never became widespread.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think people in this thread are forgetting how floaty suspension used to be. Imagine hitting a pothole and the car is still bouncing 5 seconds later. In the US at the time the National Speed Limit was 55 mph (89kph).

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You think that pic post-dates 1974?! Crap. Every day I grow older. Further or closer to god's light, who can say?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not so sure, but it does say 1976 in the title.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Other sites give late 60s. That car screams 50s to me, which was like the Cambrian period for trying stupid shit with cars.

[–] Fl1ppyR34@ani.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The car in the picture is a Volvo P1800, so the sites that say it's from the mid to late 60s seem to be relatively accurate. Or at least less inaccurate than the posts title.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The car can be from the 60s and the picture taken any time after that.

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This seems like walking with a portable CD player.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

More like the discman. Or whatever they called those.

The Walkman played tapes. You could jump around and shake that thing almost as much as you wanted without disturbing the data it was reading from the tape. With discmen, they eventually added some kind of read-ahead buffer which allowed a certain amount of “shaking” for x period of time (like 30 seconds, 60 sendings) before it would disturb the data being read and your music would get all fucked up. I imagine this record player in a car would have very similar issues while driving.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 4 points 5 months ago

I actually forgot about the Walkman/Discman split terminology, I didn't realise they changed the name to CD Walkman reasonably late.

Otherwise yeah you're absolutely right, this car record player sounds like an absolute nightmare of needle skipping and ruined vinyl.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The little pocket at the top of the backpack with the headphones symbol WAS A LIE

[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Walkman was a name used for portable radio, tape, cd, and mp3 players.

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I get that this existed but this picture looks fake as shit. What's that super low mirror reflecting, his giant yaoi ass hands or his tiny head?