this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Alternatives to Popular Services

222 readers
1 users here now

A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain assistance for, and critique self-hosted alternatives to our favorite web apps, web...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/selfhosted by /u/ottovonbizmarkie on 2025-03-29 15:36:58+00:00.


I run several containers on my server, many of which need postgres, mysql, etc, as a database. So far, I have just given them all their own instance of database. Lately I've been wondering if I should just have one separate single database server that they each can share.

I'd imagine that the pro of this somewhat reduced resources and efficiency. The cons would be that it would be a little harder to set up, and a little more complexity in networking and management, and it maybe more vulnerable that all the applications would go down if this database goes down.

I am setting up a new server and so I want to see other's take on this before I make a decision on what to do.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here