this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
427 points (98.6% liked)

World News

48958 readers
1696 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 520@kbin.social 113 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Good on the host for insisting on getting the guy's face fully on camera. That's some quick thinking.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 78 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You can see she really didn't want to address it at first. Like she immediately apologised, then the host stopped her to ask about it and she cringed when she said he had touched her. Only after the host put a stop to everything did she call the guy out on it, which she handled really well.

It seems to me her first instinct was that this could become a real problem for her, and she was safer just letting it go. It's also probably way more normal for her than for the host.

One good thing is she is the visible person and the guy who assaulted her was just some random guy, so public opinion should easily go in her favour.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

As a woman who got harassed nearly every day in the country I lived who responded to at least 40% of those with yelling and middle fingers, it's not fun, it takes a toll on you, and some days you have to choose your battles carefully. That being said, I carried a taser gun and it made my life easier. When I left to another country that was safer, I gifted said taser gun to an American girl who was in that country in exchange and was sexually harassed by a taxi driver who drove her somewhere "hidden" and tried to kiss her and she found it hard to handle things after that.

Edit: made some things bold

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're absolutely right, and I wasn't trying to criticise her for any of her decisions here. Honestly without the host intervening she was probably making the best choice to keep herself safe.

It clearly would've been easy for everyone involved to dismiss the moment and let it go if they'd chosen to, and it seems like she didn't feel like she could do anything until her host stopped things and gave her implicit permission to confront the guy.

I'm AMAB NB myself, but grew up pretty cis-passing, and I would've been pretty oblivious to most of the things she was doing here because my upbringing allowed me to be.

My point in making that comment was to help other oblivious AMAB folks see that the extraordinary part of this situation wasn't the fact a woman was assaulted, because that is going on constantly. The extraordinary part is the attention it received, and the fact both her and the host took action to make sure it got attention.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah. She’d probably been passively (or maybe even actively) taught that ignoring and tolerating abuse was the “professional” thing to do… that it was the price she had to pay for being a woman.

Fuck that noise. I’m glad to see this issue getting the attention it deserves.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 97 points 2 years ago

Good on the anchor for sticking up for her. The reporter was just going to downplay it. She needed someone to take her side. She rocks for using that encouragement to confront the guy, and the anchor set a fantastic example by speaking up. He even said to her “excuse me for interrupting you.”

It feels good to see people support each other like this. They’re both awesome.

[–] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The reality women live with is even in this thread, which has more than one comment focusing on how stupid this guy was to do it on camera, rather than how stupid and disgusting it is to do it at all.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

I guess because he's a jerk for doing it, but a really dumb jerk for doing it on camera.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The weirdest part for me in this video isn't even the groping, it's that weird pat on head that looked like: okay little girl, bye

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They say that rape isn't just about sex, but power.

If you look at the grope and head pat in that lens, they slot right in to him showing her he has power over her life and that she has none over him.

Doing it on camera really flipped that on his head, but it also highlights the realities of womans day to day life, watching out for these shitheads.

[–] SaakoPaahtaa@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Those aren't mutually exclusive. Doing that with no cameras is disgusting, doing it on camera is that and stupid, proving what many of us thought of the people doing that in the first place

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What the fuck?? This is so stupid I have a hard time believing it's real. Does this guy have a single digit IQ or something? He did this in front of a camera. And then he came back after leaving. This guy doesn't need to go to jail, he needs to go to an asylum and attend classes made for 5 year olds where they teach about consequences for actions. This is like, teenage dare level stupidity.

[–] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Also, that he ruffles her hair after the accusation. Like, I can't decide if that was belitteling like "yes, little stupid girl, just image that I touched your butt" or a powermove "I touched you and I touch you again, watch me". Either way, that this really a horrible view and show cases how much this behaviour is ingrained in some people.

[–] s20@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago

Good. Put him away for assault. Sentence him on live TV. Throw a fucking party as you throw the book at him.

Make. An. Example. Out. Of. This. Douchenozzle.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Seeing a pattern with this and the women's football coach. Incredible entitlement.

[–] MrsDoyle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Yep, not only is he a cunt, but he's a dumb cunt.

[–] girthero@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Dude definitely had a rapey vibe even after confronted.

[–] happyhippo@feddit.it 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Arrested the "suspect"?

I mean, no need to suspect anything, the footage speaks for itself

EDIT: reading the replies, TIL. Thanks folks!

[–] jagungal@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

It's a suspect and an alleged crime until they're convicted. Media outlets and journalists have been sanctioned by judges for not presuming innocence.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

Only a court can convict someone of a crime, so police always deals with "suspects", even if they know they're guilty

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sicko and bastard. This shit cannot be tolerated anymore