this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
24 points (90.0% liked)

PC Gaming

12124 readers
615 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] falidorn@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With as much puffery as this game was putting out prerelease, I kinda expecting it to be mediocre at best. Dunno if my prediction has been proven true yet but not a great beginning with this review.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, the previews I saw massively put me off. It looked uninspired if we're being generous.

[–] winety@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've been (re)playing some not-so-well-recieved RPGs recently. In august I replayed Greedfall, which PC Gamer gave a score of 67, and now I am playing the Outer Worlds, which PC Gamer gave a 79. Yes, they're flawed games, but I was and I am enjoying myself. One just has to keep one's expectations in check.

What I'm trying to say is: I look forward to buying this for 5 € in 5 years.