this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
856 points (98.4% liked)

politics

29270 readers
2124 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This came up in my health care forum.

Right now, you can legally detain someone medically when they are a danger to themselves or others for up to 72hrs. The details vary by state, but this is how we lock down individuals trying to suicide or someone mentally off the rails making threats of violence.

This variation on that law would also make opposition to Trump qualify.

Civil commitment can follow as with individuals who have profound mental illness and are not safe to be out in the world.

This is the loudest scream that democracy is dead short of hauling people out into the street and shooting them.

It’s important to note the police are currently the people who bring individuals in for the 72hr mental health holds.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Awww, they're feeling the pressure huh?

[–] Captain_J@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK.

Free speech is dead. Democracy is dead. And now the individuals who criticize Trump can be detained in a mental hospital.

Yep, we're back to the 1930s folks

[–] fff45667@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

This process is already able to be abused to swat people, and the conditions are horrible for the people being held. I've seen it as a MH worker. It's not a hospital, it's a jail. There is no treatment, only observation in cells. It's deeply traumatizing and corrupt. Coercion to get people to sign into voluntary programs ($) in order to be released, or they extend their hold. The whole thing is a travesty.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is PROOF that Republicans LOVE Freedom and are NOT Snowflakes or Fascists!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the litmus test for our democracy. If it passes we are so unbelievably fucking cooked.

We've been hurtling past brightline after brightline for decades. Now it is so flagrantly obvious, can it get any more obvious than multiple Goose-step Salutes, but more importantly the propaganda spin to play them off and justify it as not being a disqualifying action. They used to have to dog whistle their zeal for bigotry and xenophobia.

The question is, what the actual fuck are we going to do about it?

Organize? Direct action? That magic word that happens when you mash up insurance and male arousal? The DNC would not support or pardon folks involved in that effort, and the corporate media would absolutely vilify it.

The answer is obvious, with historical underpinning, although we still have to figure out how to "televise the revolution" in this day and age.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not good. Eta; has anyone mentioned similar bills in other states?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 8 points 1 year ago

In Soviet America the crackpots will hospitalize you.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's interesting is that I don't think this is in the DSM

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At the apex of the pyramid comes Big ~~Brother~~ Orange. Big ~~Brother~~ Orange is infallible and all-powerful. Every success, every achievement, every victory, every scientific discovery, all knowledge, all wisdom, all happiness, all virtue, are held to issue directly from his leadership and inspiration.

What's not to love? Of course anyone that doesn't like this guy would have to be mental!

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the bill number? Is there a link to the text for a full read?

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a Minnesota bill and the link takes you to the full text.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

We need one to counter and call it the Koolaid Cooperation Clause

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would greatly appreciate if articles like this would include the state in the title.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›