this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

Technik

882 readers
1 users here now

die Community für alles, was man als Technik beschreiben kann


the community for everything you could describe as technology


Beiträge auf Deutsch oder Englisch


Posts in German or English

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dotslashme 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What a bunch of whiny children these CEOs are. It reminds me of screaming children at the grocery store who didn't get something they wanted.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And yet, in all the CEO books, they talk about disruptive innovation, and how a “change in the rules” creates new opportunities.

Sam Altman is nothing more than a copyright violator (the courts like the term pirate) who should owe billions, if not trillions in legal penalties.

[–] smokeysnilas@feddit.org 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In a way Sam Altman becomes rich using the pirated data collected by Aaron Swartz. One gets to be an oligarch and the other is bullied into suicide.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Sad, but true. Ironic that Aaron did it to give everyone access. The other did it for greed…

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 13 points 4 months ago
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What is it in a man's soul that can make it so their eyes never quite match the look on their face?

Very rhetorical btw it's sociopathy

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You said that well. He always looks so disturbing.

[–] vrojak@feddit.org 6 points 4 months ago

I'm fine with this as long as everyone else gets the same rights and piracy stops being a crime. I'm so tired of corporation and rich people getting away with stuff that results in hefty fines or even prison for the common person.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

He's honestly not wrong

Frankly, efforts should be directed toward evolving more efficient and less error prone models, not seeking out the cheapest training material and hording it

People are so blindly angry with AI tech that they're willing to double-down on our worst corporate entitlement programs just to see Altman cry a little, and that makes me angrier than seeing a wrong AI response get passed around like gospel.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Shut the fuck up you rodent

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So the software cannot improve making connections between information, only just be fed more data.. I'm ignorant about how this works but that somewhat sounds like giving up.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's all LLMs could ever do. This was never the path to generalized AI in the colloquial sense.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

I don't think it is fair to say that. LLMs in the current form, or by themselves cannot do better. Does not mean, that this basis can be further evolved to do better. But that requires good research, and a lot of open source to cross check and evolve. There is no "business case" in that. Hoarding resources and knowledge and keeping other people from it on the other hand, is something the MBAs understand.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The software isn't doing nothing. What it does do, I would assume, could be better...

[–] Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago

Well it's about fucking time

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

Even better!